2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple zeta method for sperm selection based on membrane charge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Total sperm motility and velocities were unaffected by the brief exposure to the serum-free condition or the manipulation from the attaching-detaching process suggesting a lack of association between these parameters and zeta potential [1]. Note that the sperm fraction selected by the zeta process consisted of both motile sperm and non-motile sperm with net negative membrane charge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Total sperm motility and velocities were unaffected by the brief exposure to the serum-free condition or the manipulation from the attaching-detaching process suggesting a lack of association between these parameters and zeta potential [1]. Note that the sperm fraction selected by the zeta process consisted of both motile sperm and non-motile sperm with net negative membrane charge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The data suggested that the cryopreservation process, which involved low temperatures and exposure to glycerol and egg yolk protein, did not impact the sperm membrane net zeta potential. This was important as the crux of the zeta potential method was the negative electrokinetic charge required for selection [1,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations