2011
DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0b013e32832d8452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple, modified arthroscopic suture fixation of avulsion fracture of the tibial intercondylar eminence in children

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to describe a simple and modified technique for arthroscopic suture fixation in a 12-year-old boy who sustained a displaced type III intercondylar eminence of the tibial. The arthroscopic fixation was modified by using the Arthrex suture lasso device to place two nonabsorbable sutures into the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). However, the procedure became simple with the help of the Acufex ACL guide to reduce the avulsed tibial spine fragment and to place an appropriate tibial tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the evolution of treatment of ACL avulsion injuries in children involving tibial spine fractures, for which some authors have begun to favor suture fixation over screw fixation, suture-based repairs of PCL avulsion injuries may more easily avoid issues with permanent hardware causing impingement, imposition of rigid forces by hardware on physeal growth, or a required additional future procedure, in the form of removal of implants, which creates cost and risk for the patient. [39][40][41] However, because of the rarity of PCL injuries, no studies have compared these techniques directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the evolution of treatment of ACL avulsion injuries in children involving tibial spine fractures, for which some authors have begun to favor suture fixation over screw fixation, suture-based repairs of PCL avulsion injuries may more easily avoid issues with permanent hardware causing impingement, imposition of rigid forces by hardware on physeal growth, or a required additional future procedure, in the form of removal of implants, which creates cost and risk for the patient. [39][40][41] However, because of the rarity of PCL injuries, no studies have compared these techniques directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many successful arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) techniques using a variety of fixation methods have been described in the literature, fixation is most commonly achieved with pull-out sutures or with screws [2,8,12,13,16,17,19,27,28,31,36,44]. However, the screw fixation and the pull-out suture fixation with nonabsorbable sutures have several limitations [7,14,21,42,44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ACL guide can assist with reduction of the fragment, and to drill one or two 2 mm holes, similar to an ACL tunnel. The sutures can be pulled out the tibia through the transosseous tunnels and tied over a button or bony bridge, respectively [45].…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%