2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fetal head station was assessed (low instrumentation [vertex at +2 station] and mid‐cavity instrumentation [head is engaged but leading part above +2 station]) according to the criteria specified by the ACOG . Fetal head position was determined by transabdominal ultrasound (anterior, posterior, and transverse) . In cases of disengagement, forceps branches were disengaged and removed when expulsion was certain but before the widest diameter of the fetal head had passed through the introitus (Figures and ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fetal head station was assessed (low instrumentation [vertex at +2 station] and mid‐cavity instrumentation [head is engaged but leading part above +2 station]) according to the criteria specified by the ACOG . Fetal head position was determined by transabdominal ultrasound (anterior, posterior, and transverse) . In cases of disengagement, forceps branches were disengaged and removed when expulsion was certain but before the widest diameter of the fetal head had passed through the introitus (Figures and ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…head position was determined by transabdominal ultrasound (anterior, posterior, and transverse). 12 In cases of disengagement, forceps branches were disengaged and removed when expulsion was certain but before the widest diameter of the fetal head had passed through the introitus 9 (Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be borne in mind that the studies comparing both types of instrumental delivery, and their relation to LAM trauma, have not considered the conditions under which each instrument was applied, and thus, we believe their findings might be incomplete. In this study, as previously, we evaluated the use of each instrument whilst taking into account potential confounding factors of different instrumental techniques and found no statistically significant difference in the LAM avulsion rate between the techniques. However, in this study we included only Malmström vacuum extractor and Kielland forceps, which may explain why we found a higher avulsion rate after vacuum delivery as compared to that in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In particular, TPU offers an objective, accurate and reproducible method for the evaluation of fetal head engagement [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . The angle of progression (AoP) is one of the most reproducible and studied TPU indices of fetal head station and engagement 15,[23][24][25][26][27][28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%