2008
DOI: 10.1029/2008wr007136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple model for describing hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated porous media accounting for film and capillary flow

Abstract: [1] The commonly used models for characterizing hydraulic conductivity of porous media rely on pore bundle concepts that account for capillary flow only and neglect film flow. Experimental evidence suggests that water flow at medium to low water contents in unsaturated porous media can be significantly underestimated by these capillary bundle models. We present a new model that combines a simple film flow function with the capillary flow model of Mualem. This new model can easily be coupled to any water retent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
150
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(66 reference statements)
5
150
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the AICc, which allows comparison of models with different numbers of adjustable parameters, shows that the new model should be selected for data description. If the difference between the AICc is >10, the model with the higher AICc (the inferior model) should be disregarded because it has no support in describing the measured data (see Burnham and Anderson, 2004;Peters and Durner, 2008b). Note that the absolute, not relative, values for AICc must be compared.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the AICc, which allows comparison of models with different numbers of adjustable parameters, shows that the new model should be selected for data description. If the difference between the AICc is >10, the model with the higher AICc (the inferior model) should be disregarded because it has no support in describing the measured data (see Burnham and Anderson, 2004;Peters and Durner, 2008b). Note that the absolute, not relative, values for AICc must be compared.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the kinematic ratio and celerity under the Mualem-van Genuchten model in near-saturated soil is approaching an infinite value, which is caused by a mathematical artefact [38]. To overcome this problem, the modified Mualem-van Genuchten model was used to prevent the unrealistic variations in unsaturated hydraulic conductivity for the near-saturation range [38,[61][62][63]. The mathematical formulations of water retention curve, hydraulic conductivity, average pore velocity, celerity, and kinematic ratio based on the Brooks-Corey and Modified Mualem-van Genuchten parameterization are shown in Table 1 [35,38].…”
Section: Different Soil Hydraulic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, many studies examined a range of values of the tortuosity parameter in the fit of the actual data [4,[22][23][24], which is frequently negative [25]. The parameter, q, was estimated to be −1.5-−4.3 (−3.2 in average) in Table 2, which was obtained directly from the experimental data for Korean residual soils.…”
Section: Comparison Of Hcs Of the Modified Vgm Model With The Measurementioning
confidence: 99%