2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(01)00806-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method of detecting K-ras point mutations in stool samples for colorectal cancer screening using one-step polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HIF-1 is stabilised by p53 mutations (Kress et al, 1998;Ravi et al, 2000). Indeed, mutations in the ras oncogene and p53 antioncogene are detectable in 40 -60% of colorectal cancers (Bos, 1989;Kinzler and Vogelstein, 1996;Dong et al, 2001;Rengucci et al, 2001;Nishikawa et al, 2002;Smith et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…HIF-1 is stabilised by p53 mutations (Kress et al, 1998;Ravi et al, 2000). Indeed, mutations in the ras oncogene and p53 antioncogene are detectable in 40 -60% of colorectal cancers (Bos, 1989;Kinzler and Vogelstein, 1996;Dong et al, 2001;Rengucci et al, 2001;Nishikawa et al, 2002;Smith et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, mutations of K-ras, p53 or within the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene were not detected in any stool samples of healthy controls (Rengucci et al, 2001;Nishikawa et al, 2002;Traverso et al, 2002). However, due to the genetic heterogeneity within colorectal cancer, a multitarget assay panel (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[8][9][10] However, the proportion of genes derived from cancer cells in stools is as low as 1%. 11 At this concentration, mutations in stool DNA will not be readily detected using the most currently available gene analyzing methods, 12 such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), 13 single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), 14 and microarray chips. 15 The major drawbacks of these assays are that they lack sufficient sensitivity and high stability, and they are rather time and sample consuming and expensive for use in screening for molecular diagnostic purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%