1990
DOI: 10.1136/thx.45.11.873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for correcting single breath total lung capacity for underestimation.

Abstract: The single breath method underestimates total lung capacity by comparison with the multiple breath method (TLCmb) because of inhomogeneity of ventilation distribution. This study proposes a simple correction for the single breath TLC (TLCsb), using inert gas phase III slope to account for the effects of uneven ventilation distribution. A model of a non-uniform lung ventilation was designed, composed of a serial dead space and two alveolar compartments arranged in parallel,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On that account in apparently normal subjects this method underestimates the true volumes to a slight degree; in healthy subjects the intraindividual coefficient of variation is about 8% [71]. In subjects with airflow limitation, the underestimation of the true lung volume may become very large due to uneven distribution of inhaled gas; however, a partial correction for this can be made when the slope of the alveolar plateau (phase Ill) is recorded simultaneously [71,84].…”
Section: Single Breath Nitrogen Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On that account in apparently normal subjects this method underestimates the true volumes to a slight degree; in healthy subjects the intraindividual coefficient of variation is about 8% [71]. In subjects with airflow limitation, the underestimation of the true lung volume may become very large due to uneven distribution of inhaled gas; however, a partial correction for this can be made when the slope of the alveolar plateau (phase Ill) is recorded simultaneously [71,84].…”
Section: Single Breath Nitrogen Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Useful information can also be derived from assessing 1LC by different methods in the same patient In healthy subjects TLC assessed by the single breath helium dilution method (see § 3.7.2) is somewhat smaller (down to 83%) than when assessed with the multi-breath technique [71,84,85]. The difference can be accentuated in patients with asthma even during a period when no airflow limitation is detected, indicating abnormal unevenness of ventilation distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 85% as the lower limit of normal of VA/TLC . A low VA/TLC reflects VH, as supported by data showing that a low VA/TLC correlates with an increased inert gas phase III slope, and VA as an estimate of TLC can be corrected for the degree of VH or airflow limitation . As expected, in emphysema where there is a high degree of heterogeneous ventilation, VA/TLC underestimates total lung volume and, conversely, is a good reflection of the amount of non‐emphysematous lung on CT .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…18 In health, complete distribution of the inert gas during the brief 10-s breath-hold of the DLCO test provides VA and TLC values that are essentially equal (VA/ TLC ≥ 85%); 19 however, as VH increases, gas distribution during the measurement is reduced so that VA underestimates TLC (VA/TLC < 85%). Heterogeneous ventilation, as measured by reduced VA/TLC, is typically seen in patients with airways disease such as asthma and COPD, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] although the association of VA/TLC to AHR is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T CO is the product of lung volume and the Krogh factor (K CO ), which is the uptake of CO per unit of time, per unit of pressure difference and per unit of lung volume. This means that the difference between the RB and the SB estimates of volume, which is caused by unequal ventilation [6, 7, 8], influences the relation between the RB and SB T CO in a direct way, irrespective of the distribution of diffusion in the lung. To eliminate this effect of unequal ventilation we compared K CO measured with the RB method and with the SB method instead of comparing the RB and SB T CO .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%