1982
DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(82)90155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for calculating the probability of excluding paternity with any number of codominant alleles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Expected and observed heterozygosity values, Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and parameters of forensic interest were calculated for each marker in both populations: PD (power of discrimination and exclusion, Jones, 1972) and CE (a priori chance of exclusion, Ohno et al 1982). Due to the fact that the sample size for some islands was small, no interisland analysis of molecular variance was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expected and observed heterozygosity values, Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and parameters of forensic interest were calculated for each marker in both populations: PD (power of discrimination and exclusion, Jones, 1972) and CE (a priori chance of exclusion, Ohno et al 1982). Due to the fact that the sample size for some islands was small, no interisland analysis of molecular variance was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unbiased estimate of heterozygosity was computed according to Nei [12], discrimination power according to Jones [13] and chance of exclusion according to Ohno et al [14]. To test linkage disequilibrium it was used an exact test proposed on the Genepop program [15] and comparison of population data was carried out using an exact test with the STRUC program [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P E calculation was first described by Wiener et al (1930) for biallelic loci, and was subsequently extended to loci with any number of codominant alleles (Jamieson, 1965;Selvin, 1980;Ohno et al, 1982;Chakraborty et al, 1988;Dodds et al, 1996;Weir 1996, p 209;Jamieson and Taylor, 1997) and to dominant loci (Chakraborty et al, 1974;Gerber et al, 2000). The probability of excluding a relative of (rather than a random individual unrelated to) the true father from paternity when the maternal genotype is known was also derived (Salmon and Brocteur, 1978;Thompson and Meagher, 1987;Double et al, 1997;Fung et al, 2002;Hu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%