2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Formula for the Third Integral of Motion of Disk-Crossing Stars in the Galaxy

Abstract: We present an analytical simple formula for an approximated third integral of motion associated with nearly equatorial orbits in the Galaxy:is the vertical amplitude of the orbit at galactocentric distance R and Σ I (R) is the integrated dynamical surface mass density of the disk, a quantity which has recently become measurable. We also suggest that this relation is valid for disk-crossing orbits in a wide variety of axially symmetric galactic models, which range from razor-thin disks to disks with non-negligi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1-3). These errors are of the same order of magnitude as the errors appearing in the comparison of formula (3) with flattened Stäckel models (Vieira & Ramos-Caro 2014). Indeed, numerical experiments with Stäckel potentials (the Kuzmin-Kutuzov potential of Dejonghe & de Zeeuw 1988) show that the predictions of Eqs.…”
Section: Miyamoto-nagai Diskmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1-3). These errors are of the same order of magnitude as the errors appearing in the comparison of formula (3) with flattened Stäckel models (Vieira & Ramos-Caro 2014). Indeed, numerical experiments with Stäckel potentials (the Kuzmin-Kutuzov potential of Dejonghe & de Zeeuw 1988) show that the predictions of Eqs.…”
Section: Miyamoto-nagai Diskmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, it is well known that this approximation has a very limited range of applicability, being valid only for orbits whose vertical excursions are very small (Binney & McMillan 2011). In particular, their vertical amplitudes must be much smaller than the disk thickness (Vieira & Ramos-Caro 2014). Variants of this formula were proposed in order to overcome this problem, as for instance the corrections to the adiabatic approximation of Binney & McMillan (2011).…”
Section: Z(r) Envelopes On the R-z Planementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations