2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2020.104707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple finite-time distributed observer design for linear time-invariant systems

Abstract: A design of a distributed observer is proposed for continuous-time systems with nonlinear observer nodes such that the estimation errors converge in a finite time to zero. By taking advantage of individual observability decompositions, the designs for the locally observable and the unobservable substate are made independent from each other. For the observable substate of each node, standard centralized finite-time observer techniques are applied. To estimate distributively the unobservable substate, the observ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is possible to add this feature to the independent state estimators proposed here, we avoid this solution and concentrate, instead, in the reconstruction of the full state via direct information exchange between the nodes. Luenberger observer-based DSEs that enjoy the FCT property have already been reported in [18], [19], [20]. Our GPEBO-based DSE outperforms these designs due to the following considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Although it is possible to add this feature to the independent state estimators proposed here, we avoid this solution and concentrate, instead, in the reconstruction of the full state via direct information exchange between the nodes. Luenberger observer-based DSEs that enjoy the FCT property have already been reported in [18], [19], [20]. Our GPEBO-based DSE outperforms these designs due to the following considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The periodic gain K (Ac,h) (t) in (39) depends on the closed-loop system matrix Ac. We next establish a method where only the openloop system matrix A is involved.…”
Section: B Solution To Problem 2 By State Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K0 and K (Ac,h) (t) are the same as that in (40) and (39), and h > 0 is some constant. The initial condition z(s), s ≤ 0 can be arbitrarily chosen.…”
Section: B State-observer and Predictor-based Periodic Delayed Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in general case, these LMIs are infeasible for homogeneous Persidskii systems due to homogeneity imposes some restrictions on system matrices (e.g., linear part of the system is presented or can be reduced to the form A 0 x, x ∈ R n with a nilpotent matrix A 0 ∈ R n×n ), and the approach of [17] does not take into account a possible homogeneity of the system, then the used Lyapunov function cannot be homogeneous. In some cases this problem can be handled with the use of homogeneous approximations as in [25]. However, this approach does not allow to obtain settling time estimations and does not provide quantitative robustness analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%