2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-013-0399-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple distinct element modeling of the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments in deep seabed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although developed from idealized analog soil grains, the proposed bond failure criterion is applicable to realistic geomaterials once the local information (e.g., bond size, bond tensile strength, and bond compressive strength) is numerically reached from an ‘inverse analysis’ based on macroscopic experimental behavior. Such a procedure has been illustrated by several applications of the previous bond contact model attained from similar experimental setting, for instance, DEM modeling of natural sands , methane hydrate‐bearing sands , and rocks . In the spirit of the methodology discussed here, we envisage more realistic applications by extending the approach to 3D space, which will be one of our future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although developed from idealized analog soil grains, the proposed bond failure criterion is applicable to realistic geomaterials once the local information (e.g., bond size, bond tensile strength, and bond compressive strength) is numerically reached from an ‘inverse analysis’ based on macroscopic experimental behavior. Such a procedure has been illustrated by several applications of the previous bond contact model attained from similar experimental setting, for instance, DEM modeling of natural sands , methane hydrate‐bearing sands , and rocks . In the spirit of the methodology discussed here, we envisage more realistic applications by extending the approach to 3D space, which will be one of our future works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results indicated that: different GHBS preparation methods such as gas saturated method and water saturated method lead to obvious differences in the mechanical behavior; the GH existence mode in the pores of sediments varies with the increase of GH saturation, leading to the transition of the deformation from shear shrinkage to shear dilatancy. Constitutive models were established to describe the mechanical behaviors of GHBS by using linear elastic or nonlinear elasto-plastic models, such as the Discrete Element Method, Duncan-Chang model, Cam-clay model [16][17][18][19][20]. Those models can consider two or three phases in GHBS, but are incapable of describing the effects of GH dissociation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cementation model [17,18], hydrates nucleate at inter-granular contacts and the existing soil skeleton structure is cemented by the hydrates, while the soil-soil (s-s) contacts are not bonded. In most of the previous DEM studies simulating the behaviour of methane hydrate soils [15][16][17][18][19][20], it was assumed that all the soil and hydrate particles were spheres. However, it is well known that the shape of soil particles has a large influence on its mechanical behaviour [17,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%