The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-016-5962-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and linear isoconversional method to determine the pre-exponential factors and the mathematical reaction mechanism functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the evolution of E a and A along with their related uncertainty intervals (errors bars) computed by all considered isoconversional approaches (TAS, it‐KAS, it‐FWO, and VYA/CE) with extent of conversion changing from 0.02 to 0.98 for the thermal decomposition of MCCN1. It can be observed from Figure and Table S1–S4, Supporting Information that the relative errors of the activation energies and the pre‐exponential factors obtained from the used isoconversional integral procedures are very close, demonstrating their comparable accuracy …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure shows the evolution of E a and A along with their related uncertainty intervals (errors bars) computed by all considered isoconversional approaches (TAS, it‐KAS, it‐FWO, and VYA/CE) with extent of conversion changing from 0.02 to 0.98 for the thermal decomposition of MCCN1. It can be observed from Figure and Table S1–S4, Supporting Information that the relative errors of the activation energies and the pre‐exponential factors obtained from the used isoconversional integral procedures are very close, demonstrating their comparable accuracy …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As can be clearly checked, the Arrhenius parameters evaluated by the different used isoconversional kinetic methods present comparable trend and close values, except those computed based on it‐FWO approach, which shows slightly lower values of Arrhenius parameters than those obtained by TAS, it‐KAS, and VYA/CE, while keeping the same evolution. This finding was expected since it‐FWO equation employs only the first approximation of the temperature integral …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations