2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-007-9196-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and efficient procedure for the numerical simulation of wind fields in complex terrain

Abstract: In spite of recent progress in the prognostic numerical simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer, the explicit simulation of turbulent flows in actual complex terrain is generally still very complicated and time consuming for many environmental applications.In an attempt to develop simpler and more efficient application oriented techniques, although less refined, we propose a multi-step procedure for simulating wind fields. Once obtained the necessary meteorological input, the mass-consistent modelling tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be achieved by modifying the model parameters using climate data derived from dynamical climate models (i.e., GCMs and RCMs); however, this aspect is not addressed here. AWE‐GEN‐2d is a substantial evolution and combination of four preceding models: (i) AWE‐GEN model [ Curtis and Eagleson , ; Ivanov et al ., ; Fatichi et al ., ]; (ii) STREAP model [ Paschalis et al ., ]; (iii) HiReS‐WG model [ Peleg and Morin , ]; and (iv) WINDS model [ Burlando et al ., ]. The WG structure is presented in the following sections together with an example where the model is calibrated and tested: the Engelberg region, an area of complex topography located in the Swiss Alps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by modifying the model parameters using climate data derived from dynamical climate models (i.e., GCMs and RCMs); however, this aspect is not addressed here. AWE‐GEN‐2d is a substantial evolution and combination of four preceding models: (i) AWE‐GEN model [ Curtis and Eagleson , ; Ivanov et al ., ; Fatichi et al ., ]; (ii) STREAP model [ Paschalis et al ., ]; (iii) HiReS‐WG model [ Peleg and Morin , ]; and (iv) WINDS model [ Burlando et al ., ]. The WG structure is presented in the following sections together with an example where the model is calibrated and tested: the Engelberg region, an area of complex topography located in the Swiss Alps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This semi-automated procedure involves a suitable mix of systematic quantitative controls and qualitative expert judgments. The quantitative controls are based on the comparison between the detected values of the gust factors, G 60 , G 10 , G 1 , and their reference values, G 0 60 , G 0 10 , G 0 1 , evaluated by means of numerical simulations (ESDU, 1993;Burlando et al, 2007Burlando et al, , 2013 assuming that intense wind speeds occur in neutral atmospheric conditions during synoptic extra-tropical cyclones with stationary Gaussian properties. Conceptually, a wind event is labelled as an extra-tropical cyclone if the ratios G 60 /G 0 60 , G 10 /G 0 10 , G 1 /G 0 1 are small.…”
Section: Separation and Classification Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative controls are based on the comparison between the detected values of the gust factors, .% , $% , $ , and their reference values, .% % , $% % , $ % , evaluated by means of numerical simulations (ESDU, 1993;Burlando et al, 2007; assuming that intense wind speeds occur in neutral atmospheric conditions during synoptic extra-tropical cyclones with stationary Gaussian properties. Conceptually, a wind event is labeled as an extra-tropical cyclone if the ratios .% / .% % , $% / $% % , $ / $ % are small.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%