2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A signal-on electrochemical aptasensor for rapid detection of aflatoxin B1 based on competition with complementary DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phosphate groups are negatively charged, which makes the aptamers negatively charged; thus, the immobilized aptamers repel the [Fe (CN) 6 ] 3–/4– anions from the electrode surface and also acts as a barrier for electron transfer [ 37 ]. After incubation of the CNT-ME/aptamer with cDNA, the redox current peak was slightly increased (I p = 10.94 mA), which may be due to the hybridization that makes the negatively charged Aptamer-MB distant from the electrode surface, hence increasing electron transfer near the electrode surface [ 38 ]. For the AgNP-ME, immobilizing the AgNPs also increased the peak current, which resulted in being higher compared to the CNT-ME, due to the higher conductivity of AgNPs compared to CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phosphate groups are negatively charged, which makes the aptamers negatively charged; thus, the immobilized aptamers repel the [Fe (CN) 6 ] 3–/4– anions from the electrode surface and also acts as a barrier for electron transfer [ 37 ]. After incubation of the CNT-ME/aptamer with cDNA, the redox current peak was slightly increased (I p = 10.94 mA), which may be due to the hybridization that makes the negatively charged Aptamer-MB distant from the electrode surface, hence increasing electron transfer near the electrode surface [ 38 ]. For the AgNP-ME, immobilizing the AgNPs also increased the peak current, which resulted in being higher compared to the CNT-ME, due to the higher conductivity of AgNPs compared to CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for instance, the difference in the number of aptamers immobilized on WE between one aptasensor and another may decrease the sensitivity. However, by subtracting the current generated from the blank sample, in this way, only the current generated because of the analyte will be measured, no matter the amount of the aptamers immobilized on the WE [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Hence, we increase the reproducibility of the aptasensors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also shown that minor current change was observed in the presence of interfering mycotoxins. The proposed aptasensor was successfully used for the analysis of beer and white grape wine samples spiked with aflatoxin B [157]. The other example of aptasensor for aflatoxin B1 detection was elaborated by Nodoushan et al In their approach, a screen-printed carbon electrode was modified with GO and gold nanowires, which was followed by the incubation with thiol-modified single-stranded DNA that hybridized with aflatoxin B1 specific aptamer strand.…”
Section: Aflatoxin Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another electrochemical aptasensor achieving rapid detection of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was designed and developed by Zhao [66]. A short anti-AFB1 aptamer having a methylene blue (MB) as redox tag was immobilized on the surface of a gold electrode.…”
Section: Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%