2016
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2015.1117523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shift from offline to online: Adolescence, the internet and social participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze people's relations in internet era, William [24] and Tiwari et al [25] differentiated between online and offline relationship. Yet, Kennedy and Lynch [26] and Neves et al [27] argue that distinguishing acquaintances based on online and offline acquaintances seems irrelevant since both have merged in the accumulation of interactions. Most people manage their offline ties via online interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze people's relations in internet era, William [24] and Tiwari et al [25] differentiated between online and offline relationship. Yet, Kennedy and Lynch [26] and Neves et al [27] argue that distinguishing acquaintances based on online and offline acquaintances seems irrelevant since both have merged in the accumulation of interactions. Most people manage their offline ties via online interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging research indicates that social interactions among adolescents are moving online with 45% of teens now using social media every day, and 10% of those individuals spending more than nine hours a day on various social networking websites (Common Sense Media, 2015;Kennedy & Lynch, 2016). While there are many benefits to social media use, the documented negative effects of extensive media use on neurotypical adolescents reflects issues with off-task behaviors (Hollis & Was, 2016), stress, anxiety, and depression (Woods & Scott, 2016), empathy (Vossen & Valkenburg, 2016), loneliness (Pittman & Reich, 2016), and awareness of others (Hwang, 2015).…”
Section: Social Emotional Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Health Organization's (2001) definition -involvement in life situations -does not capture its complexity (Hemmingsson & Jonsson, 2005), as it has been used in various collocations, such as participation in everyday life (e.g., Häggblom Kronlöf, 2007;Larsson Lund, 2004), participation in occupations (e.g., Law, 2002Law, , 2013, occupational participation (e.g., Kielhofner, 2008), and social participation (e.g., Kennedy & Lynch, 2016;Levasseur, Richard, Gauvin, & Raymond, 2010). Several authors (Hammel et al, 2008;Sakiyama, Josephsson, & Asaba, 2010;Silva, Thorén-Jönsson, Sunnerhagen, & Dahlin-Ivanoff, 2016) view it as a process, or a negotiation of individual, social, and societal needs and values, that can provide opportunities to experience meaning and satisfaction, as well as develop identity and worth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal computers, smartphones, and computer tablets -including applications that accompany these devicescombined with the Internet and the World Wide Web are steadily replacing earlier methods (e.g., landline telephone [Mann, Belchior, Tomita, & Kemp, 2005], vinyl records and tapes [Utterback & Acee, 2005], cash payment services [Dahlberg, Mallat, Ondrus, & Zmijewska, 2008]). At the same time, new technologies are augmenting existing methods and expanding possibilities for participation in various life domains (e.g., education [Nguyen, Barton, & Nguyen, 2015], socializing [Kennedy & Lynch, 2016]). Among older adults, digital technology has been found to be useful in managing one's finances, keeping in contact with others, and procuring services, products, and information online (Aguilar, Boerema, & Harrison, 2010;Gatto & Tak, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%