A shelter belt study—Relative shelter, effective winds and maximum efficiency

Hogg, W. H.

doi:10.1016/0002-1571(65)90024-5

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1974

1995

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Budiantho 1989, Rawat 1991, Campbell et al 1991. Only a few studies of spacing or rowplanting of birchwoods have been done and most of them are from shelterbelt trials in USA or Russia (George 1948, Hogg 1965, Torokhtun 1981, Stadnik 1982, Rakov 1990.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of initial spacing and row‐to‐row distance on the growth and yield of silver birch(betula pendula)

Niemistö¹

1995

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of initial spacing and row‐to‐row distance on the growth and yield of silver birch(betula pendula)

Niemistö¹

1995

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The influence of weather variability on evaporation leeward of A medium porous barrier

Rollin

1984

J. Climatol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Black porous disc atmometers were used to measure daily evaporation ( E ) at a distance of 4H (where H is barrier height) leeward of a medium porous hedge and in the open. The modification of E at the sheltered position was defined, in relative terms, as the percentage of the sheltered E to that in the open (relative E ) and in absolute terms as the difference between the open and sheltered E totals. Although relative E was found to vary as a linear function of the relative wind (RW), E differences varied also with the meteorological conditions influencing the 'evaporative climate', identified here by the weather parameters: cloud cover, relative humidity and wind speed. For a particular value of relative E , the E differences were greatest on days with no cloud, low humidity and moderate wind speed and least on cloudy, humid days with low wind speed.

show abstract