1974
DOI: 10.1016/0002-1571(74)90027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind reduction by a highly permeable tree shelter-belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data on wind directions (not shown here) revealed that during the sampling period in 2002 the wind was blowing from different directions during the course of the day, while in 2001 it was predominantly blowing from southwest (shelterbelt is on the south of the field). Other studies also have reported similar magnitudes of wind reduction (Rosenberg et al 1983, Miller et al 1975). Maximum and minimum air temperatures at 3H were generally found to be higher than in the unsheltered (25H) area as the result of the reduction in turbulent mixing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Data on wind directions (not shown here) revealed that during the sampling period in 2002 the wind was blowing from different directions during the course of the day, while in 2001 it was predominantly blowing from southwest (shelterbelt is on the south of the field). Other studies also have reported similar magnitudes of wind reduction (Rosenberg et al 1983, Miller et al 1975). Maximum and minimum air temperatures at 3H were generally found to be higher than in the unsheltered (25H) area as the result of the reduction in turbulent mixing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The samplers were placed at distances that were multiples of the orchard canopy height (H) downwind from the edge. Horizontal distances are expressed as x/H because shelter effects downwind from windbreaks (van Eimern, 1964;Brown and Rosenberg, 1970;Miller et al, 1975) and forests edges (Miller et al, 1991) on wind speeds, turbulence, and related transport processes have long been shown to scale with the height of the sheltering canopy.…”
Section: Spray Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miller et al (1975) suggested a shelterbelt drag, characterized by the integrated wind reduction curve or a drag coefficient, as a practical basis for comparison of the effectiveness of different field shelterbelts. Gandemer (1979Gandemer ( , 1981 suggested a shelter parameter based on the generally accepted critical level of discomfort, and the corresponding discomfort wind frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%