2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2418(200005)16:3<277::aid-rsa4>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sharp concentration inequality with applications

Abstract: We present a new general concentration-of-measure inequality and illustrate its power by applications in random combinatorics. The results nd direct applications in some problems of learning theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
181
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
181
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This would entail improving the inequality given in Proposition 2 under propitious conditions, namely margin type conditions. Boucheron et al's (2000) concentration inequality seems to be the adequate tool, though it can not be directly applied because of the dependence between the weights involved in the bootstrap processes. Some refined Poissonization techniques may allow us to overcome this difficulty, and this may be the subject of a future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would entail improving the inequality given in Proposition 2 under propitious conditions, namely margin type conditions. Boucheron et al's (2000) concentration inequality seems to be the adequate tool, though it can not be directly applied because of the dependence between the weights involved in the bootstrap processes. Some refined Poissonization techniques may allow us to overcome this difficulty, and this may be the subject of a future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we focus on random penalty functions. This subject has been tackled by Buescher and Kumar (1996), Lugosi and Nobel (1999) and Boucheron et al (2000) but the most interesting works for our approach are the ones due to Koltchinskii (2001) and Bartlett et al (2002). Let ξ denote the sample (X 1 , Y 1 ), .…”
Section: Theorem 1 (Mcdiarmid)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One candidate for comparison is the result proved in [2], which has almost the same conclusion (slightly better with (2=3) t in the denominator in (6) instead of t), but requires the much stronger self-boundedness conditions…”
Section: Theorem 1 For T > 0 We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originating in the work of Leonard Gross on logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for Gaussian measures [6], the method has been developed and re…ned by Ledoux, Bobkov, Massart, Boucheron, Lugosi, Rio, Bousquet and others ( see [8], [10], [11], [2], [3], etc) to become an important tool in the study of empirical processes and learning theory. In [2, Boucheron at al] a general theorem on con…guration functions is presented, which improves on the results obtained from the convex distance inequality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%