The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2016
DOI: 10.1137/151003209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Shape-Topological Control Problem for Nonlinear Crack-Defect Interaction: The Antiplane Variational Model

Abstract: We consider the shape-topological control of a singularly perturbed variational inequality. The geometry-dependent state problem that we address in this paper concerns a heterogeneous medium with a micro-object (defect) and a macro-object (crack) modeled in 2d.The corresponding nonlinear optimization problem subject to inequality constraints at the crack is considered within a general variational framework. For the reason of asymptotic analysis, singular perturbation theory is applied resulting in the topologi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As δ tends to zero, we can derive the existence theorem below. The proof of Theorem 3 follows the proof given in [17] based on the properties (10)- (12) for the specific case F(σ) = Ψ 2 (∥σ∥)σ.…”
Section: Well-posedness Theoremmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As δ tends to zero, we can derive the existence theorem below. The proof of Theorem 3 follows the proof given in [17] based on the properties (10)- (12) for the specific case F(σ) = Ψ 2 (∥σ∥)σ.…”
Section: Well-posedness Theoremmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The uniform bound in (10) together with (2) leads to ∥ε∥ ≤ M 1 implying limiting small strain for small M 1 . The bounds in (11) describe the monotone and Lipschitz continuous properties of F. After integration over Ω c , property (12) provides σ with the following lower bound in the L 1 -norm:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a mathematical point of view an analysis of cracked composite structures is significantly more complicated because of the presence of nonregular boundary components . In this regard, the influence of mechanical and geometric properties of inclusions on crack‐tip sensitivities is a challenging mathematical problem . It is well known that imposing linear boundary conditions on a crack may lead to physical inconsistency of mathematical models since a mutual penetration of the crack faces may happen…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, within the framework of crack models subject to nonpenetration (contact) conditions, a number of papers have been published, concerning shape optimization problems for delaminated rigid inclusions, see, for example . For a heterogeneous two dimensional body with a micro‐object (defect) and a macro‐object (crack), the antiplane strain energy release rate is expressed by means of the mode‐III stress intensity factor that is examined with respect to small defects such as microcracks, holes, and inclusions . The ability of velocity methods to describe changes of topology by creating defects like holes is investigated in [].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%