2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00427-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Serpent/OpenFOAM coupling for 3D burnup analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last contribution pertaining to this subsection is the description of a very ambitious project [9] (and an erratum in [10]). The coupling of neutronic, thermal-hydraulic and fuel cycle analyses within a multiphysics model is again developed in Serpent and OpenFOAM: due to the complexity of the calculation, it is limited to considering a single fuel pin surrounded by water; this simulation cannot be presently carried out for a full-scale system, which will be the topic for the next set of contributions.…”
Section: Multiphysics Simulation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last contribution pertaining to this subsection is the description of a very ambitious project [9] (and an erratum in [10]). The coupling of neutronic, thermal-hydraulic and fuel cycle analyses within a multiphysics model is again developed in Serpent and OpenFOAM: due to the complexity of the calculation, it is limited to considering a single fuel pin surrounded by water; this simulation cannot be presently carried out for a full-scale system, which will be the topic for the next set of contributions.…”
Section: Multiphysics Simulation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In the past decade, a favorable alternative has been developed to achieve better modeling accuracy, the socalled "best estimate" methodology, which relies on highfidelity models, employing coupled Monte Carlo neutron transport calculations, burnup calculation, and thermalmechanics and thermal-hydraulics codes. [3][4][5][6] To validate these approaches, benchmark analysis with experimental data 4 is of primary importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%