A Semiparametric Transformation Approach to Estimating Usual Daily Intake Distributions

Abstract

bstractThe distribution of usual intakes of dietary components is important to individuals formulating food policy and to persons designing nutrition education programs. Usual intake of a dietary component for a person is the long run average of daily intakes of that component for that person. Because it is impossible to directly observe usual intake of an individual, it is necessary to develop an estimator of the distribution of usual intakes based on a sample of individuals with a small number of daily observations on each individual. Daily intake data for individuals are nonnegative and often very skewed. Also, there is large day-to-day variation relative to the individual-to-individual variation and the within-individual variance is correlated with the individual means. We suggest a methodology for estimating usual intake distributions that allows for varying degrees of departure from normality and recognizes the measurement error associated with daily dietary intakes. The estimation method contains four steps. First, the original data are standardized by adjusting for weekday and interview sequence effects. Second, the daily intake data are transformed to normality using a combination of power and grafted polynomial transformations. Third, using a normal components-of-variance model, the distribution of usual intakes is constructed for the transformed data. Finally, a transformation of normal usual intakes to the original scale is defined. The approach works well for a set of dietary components selected from the [1985][1986]

Calcium Supplement and Bone Medication Use in a US Medicare Health Maintenance Organization

“…Thus it appears that the majority of our subjects had total calcium intakes of less than the recommended intake of 1200 mg/day [4]. This is consistent with the finding that median calcium intakes from food in the United States are only 50% (women) to 60% (men) of the amount recommended [3]. Calcium supplement use in our study population was more prevalent than that reported in the 1986 National Health Interview Survey (26% of women and 14% of men age 65 years and older) [13], probably for a combination of regional, secular and methodologic reasons.…”

“…Despite this knowledge, dietary calcium and vitamin D intakes in this population remain far below recommended levels [3,4]. Supplementation is one means of closing the gap.…”

Does a small difference in iodine status among children in two regions of Belgium translate into a different prevalence of thyroid nodular diseases in adults?

“…The usual intake of fish, crustaceans and molluscs and milk and milk products was estimated with the Nusser method [18] using the C-side software [19,20]. This method eliminates the intra-individual variance and additionally transforms the data to obtain approximately normally distributed data.…”

Computational tool for usual intake modelling workable at the European level

“…The reason for this is that the exposure estimates contain both the variation between and within individuals, whereas for a long-term exposure only the variation between individuals is relevant, since dayto-day variations level out in the long run. To remove the within individual variation from the exposure distribution variance component models have been developed, including the Iowa State University Foods Model (ISUF) (Nusser et al, 1996(Nusser et al, , 1997, the Betabinomial-Normal model (BBN) (de Boer et al, 2009), the LogisticNormal-Normal model (LLN, NCI) (Dodd, 2011;, the Statistical Program to Assess Dietary Exposure (SPADE) (van Rossum et al, 2011) and the Multiple Source Method (MSM) (Harttig et al, 2011). For an overview of these models, we refer to .…”