2021
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2021.3049194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Semi-Powered Ankle Prosthesis and Unified Controller for Level and Sloped Walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While [33], [37], [38], [42] enabled variable-speed walking and [38] enabled obstacle crossing, these approaches were limited to level ground and relied on an FSM to switch between regions of the nonlinear quasi-stiffness curve during stance. Similarly, a quasi-passive ankle prosthesis presented in [43] enabled variable-incline walking with limited tuning by implementing a constant external quasi-stiffness relationship between the global shank angle and ankle torque. This external quasi-stiffness relationship was shown to be invariant across inclines during midstance, obviating the need for real-time incline estimation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While [33], [37], [38], [42] enabled variable-speed walking and [38] enabled obstacle crossing, these approaches were limited to level ground and relied on an FSM to switch between regions of the nonlinear quasi-stiffness curve during stance. Similarly, a quasi-passive ankle prosthesis presented in [43] enabled variable-incline walking with limited tuning by implementing a constant external quasi-stiffness relationship between the global shank angle and ankle torque. This external quasi-stiffness relationship was shown to be invariant across inclines during midstance, obviating the need for real-time incline estimation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By relaxing the actuation speed and torque requirements, these semi-active and quasi-passive prostheses can be made lighter and smaller and still achieve longer battery life than fully powered prostheses. For example, designing the knee actuator to power only stair ambulation (33,34) or only the swing phase of gait (32,40) leads to a lighter and smaller prosthesis. Similarly, lighter and smaller ankle/foot prostheses can be developed by avoiding net-positive energy injection (41), limiting the active control of movements to non-weight-bearing activities (38,42), or adjusting the mechanical stiffness of the prosthetic joint (37).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint quasi-stiffness during human walking has been useful in control systems of robotic exoskeletons, prostheses, and bipedal robots which mimic the normal biomechanical behaviour of the human lower limb [10][11][12]. A common control method for wearable robotics is to set the relative impedances (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%