2021
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2020.1871100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semantic segmentation method with category boundary for Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) mapping of Very-High Resolution (VHR) remote sensing image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISPR Vaihingen and Potsdam are the widely used benchmark datasets, followed by GID, Landcover.ai, DeepGlobe and WHDLD. The ISPRS Vaihingen comprises 33 aerial image patches in IRRGB format along with their associated digital surface model (DEM) data, each with a size of around 2500 × 2500 pixels at 9 cm spatial resolution [95,96]. Similarly, the publicly accessible ISPRS Potsdam dataset encompasses Potsdam city, Germany.…”
Section: Benchmark Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISPR Vaihingen and Potsdam are the widely used benchmark datasets, followed by GID, Landcover.ai, DeepGlobe and WHDLD. The ISPRS Vaihingen comprises 33 aerial image patches in IRRGB format along with their associated digital surface model (DEM) data, each with a size of around 2500 × 2500 pixels at 9 cm spatial resolution [95,96]. Similarly, the publicly accessible ISPRS Potsdam dataset encompasses Potsdam city, Germany.…”
Section: Benchmark Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that any value of α is greater than β, the imbalanced image segmentation datasets can be handled more effectively. On the other hand, the γ parameter that determines the behavior of the FTL function in Equation ( 2) varies in the range [1,3]. Although the effect of γ relatively changes depending on TI value, in their experiments, Abraham and Khan [48] stated that the best performance was observed with γ = 4/3.…”
Section: Training Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, semantic segmentation in Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) change detection takes a considerable part in the RS literature. Venugopal [2] explained an automatic semantic segmentationbased change detection that produces a final change between the given two input images, while [3] described a semantic segmentation method with category boundary for LULC mapping. Touzani and Granderson [4], which can be considered in the scope of GIS applications, made improvements to existing accuracy of automatic building footprint extractions from RS images using a deep learning model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the CLCM with domain adaptation as a pixel-level and multi-category segmentation task, whose experimental results are generally evaluated via the generated confusion matrix. Referring to it, TP, FP, TN, and FN denote the numbers of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives [53,54]. Having access to these indexes, the following four metrics, i.e., per-class accuracy, overall accuracy, balanced F (F1) score, and intersection-over-union (IoU), are given to prove the validity effectiveness of our proposed CsCANet.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%