2009
DOI: 10.1080/09511920802616781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semantic-mediation architecture for interoperable supply-chain applications

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a semantic-mediation architecture that enables standards-based interoperability between heterogeneous supply-chain applications. The architecture was implemented using a state-of-the-art semantic-mediation toolset for design-time and run-time integration tasks. The design-time tools supported a domain ontology definition, message annotations, message schema transformations, and reconciliation rules specifications. The run-time tools performed exchanges, transformations, and reconc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained in Section 2, this type of mismatched case is called an 'element granularity mismatch'. Semantic Gateway resolves this element granularity mismatch by having the original message from OEM go though four translation steps as shown below, where (1) and (2) are captured in Figure 6, while (3) (1) (Lifting OEM's XML to OEM's RDF) the two elements, './customer' and './partName' of the OEM's BOD lift into the corresponding RDF document and constitute L OEM according to the XML to RDF transformation algorithm (Vujasinovic et al 2008).…”
Section: Illustrative Example Resolving a Data Mismatch Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As explained in Section 2, this type of mismatched case is called an 'element granularity mismatch'. Semantic Gateway resolves this element granularity mismatch by having the original message from OEM go though four translation steps as shown below, where (1) and (2) are captured in Figure 6, while (3) (1) (Lifting OEM's XML to OEM's RDF) the two elements, './customer' and './partName' of the OEM's BOD lift into the corresponding RDF document and constitute L OEM according to the XML to RDF transformation algorithm (Vujasinovic et al 2008).…”
Section: Illustrative Example Resolving a Data Mismatch Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, Bicer et al share their framework, Artemis 3 through an open source agreement. On the contrary, for any-to-one architecture, ATHENA 4 provided a toolset for both design and run-time activities to enable the proposed semantic mediation of heterogeneous XML messages (Vujasinovic et al 2008). Our proposed system adopts the any-to-one approach with further studies in Sections 5 to 7, each of which provides a specific literature review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their potential for achieving a more effective and efficient management of the information spread out along the chain is a major research opportunity, largely with a view to driving innovation in industry. Another series of papers with a more technical slant focuses on the development of such systems, proposing innovative designs and architectures (e.g., Grefen et al, 2009;Vujasinovic et al, 2009). …”
Section: ---Table 2 ---mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main body of research in supply chain information interoperability has been focused on information exchange among the supply chain participants after the supply chain is configured [1]. However, information interoperability in preconfiguration stages is equally important as it improves the quality of communication among suppliers when searching for appropriate manufacturing counterparts [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One promising approach for addressing the interoperability issue is the use of formal ontologies that encode explicit capability knowledge. In fact, several research projects have used ontological approach for dealing with information interoperability in manufacturing supply chains [1,3,4]. One of the key challenges in developing ontologies is knowledge acquisition especially when dealing with a vast and complex domain such as manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%