Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep28169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-sustaining atomic magnetometer with τ−1 averaging property

Abstract: Quantum measurement using coherent superposition of intrinsic atomic states has the advantage of being absolute measurement and can form metrological standards. One example is the absolute measurement of magnetic field by monitoring the Larmor precession of atomic spins whilst another being the Ramsey type atomic clock. Yet, in almost all coherent quantum measurement, the precision is limited by the coherence time beyond which, the uncertainty decreases only as τ−1/2. Here we show that by non-destructively mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This spin probe is analogue to the self-sustaining Larmor precession signal detected in the magnetometer experiments of Refs. 54 , 55 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spin probe is analogue to the self-sustaining Larmor precession signal detected in the magnetometer experiments of Refs. 54 , 55 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bandwidth could be greatly increased by self-oscillation method. [6] And the sensitivity near the bandwidth frequency is found to be 100 fT/Hz 1/2 . Frequency/Hz Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity With a Single Indirect Pumpmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1] Compared to the double resonance magnetometer, BBM has its advantage of being all optical, which does not produce any radio frequency fields, and has become an important type of atomic magnetometer. [2][3][4][5][6][7] The precession of the atomic spin polarization can be monitored by the paramagnetic Faraday rotation of another linearly polarized probe beam. [8] Such geometry is back-action evading and has the potential of achieving sensitivities beyond the standard quantum limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] In the 1950s, Kaslter et al developed optical methods to polarize and probe the spin of unpaired electron. [3,4] Since then, there appears a lot of researches on different magnetic resonance magnetometers, such as Bell-Bloom magnetometer, [5][6][7] Mx magnetomter, [8][9][10] Mz magnetomter, [11,12] CPT (coherent population trapping) magnetometer, [13,14] and SERF (spin exchange relaxation free) magnetometer, [15][16][17][18] etc. One of the most important issues of these magnetometers is the magnetic resonance linewidth which is related directly to the fundamental sensitivity of atomic magnetometer by δ B = (1/γ) ∆ω/nV t, where ∆ω is the linewidth of the magnetometer, n is the density of the alkali atoms, V is the cell volume, t is the measurement time, and γ is the gyromagnetic ratio of the alkali atom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the alkali atoms encounter the bare glass surface of the cell wall, it can be captured for a little while (10 −5 s-10 −7 s) and be completely depolarized by the ions and molecules within the glass. [24] Paraffin, [25] OTS (octadecyltrichlorosilane), [26][27][28] and alkene [7,29] are all proved to be able to reduce the relaxation rate due to cell wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%