2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2018.8824600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-supervised Deep Learning Network for Low-Dose CT Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-supervised learning falls between unsupervised learning (with no labeled training data) and supervised learning (with only labeled training data). Some of semi-supervised and unsupervised studies reviewed are [39,66,74,[127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140]. For example, [129] proposed an unsupervised model-based deep learning (MBDL) for LDCT reconstruction.…”
Section: Applications In Semi-supervised/unsupervised Mannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-supervised learning falls between unsupervised learning (with no labeled training data) and supervised learning (with only labeled training data). Some of semi-supervised and unsupervised studies reviewed are [39,66,74,[127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140]. For example, [129] proposed an unsupervised model-based deep learning (MBDL) for LDCT reconstruction.…”
Section: Applications In Semi-supervised/unsupervised Mannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Liang et al reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images using three algorithms and reported improved root mean squared error and structure similarity index compared with the values measured in original CT images. 23 Hu compared a GAN, CNN, and modified GAN using Wasserstein distance and reported that the latter was most effective in the noise reduction from CBCT images. 24 Hegazy reported improved the relative error by 5.7%, and the standardized absolute difference by 8.2% using modified U-net algorithm compared to the conventional method.…”
Section: ) Image Quality Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By downsampling the total number of acquired projections, the radiation dose received by patients could be dramatically reduced. In the low-milliampere-seconds scanning method, the tube output is reduced, and the noise of the CT images is substantially elevated (2)(3)(4). However, sparse-view CT images reconstructed from the conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm experience strong streaking artifacts and a loss of anatomical structure due to angular undersampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%