Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 72 1983
DOI: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.72.120.1983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Seismic Reflection Study of the Rio Grande Rise

Abstract: Seismic reflection profiles have been interpreted in combination with deep-sea drilling data to examine the sedimentary evolution of the Rio Grande Rise.Restricted and unevenly distributed seismic reflection coverage (particularly multichannel) and limited well control confined most of our interest to the northern flank of the main western elevated block of the Rise, near to DSDP Site 516. The basement of much of the Rise above approximately 3000 m present depth has the "dipping reflector" character of some co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data processing included resampling, spherical divergence corrections and zero-phase conversions undertaken prior to stacking, 3D pre-stack time migration using the Stolt algorithm and one-pass 3D migration. Published borehole data from Deep Sea Drilling Program (DSDP) Sites 356 (Kumar et al, 1997) and 515/516 (Barker, 1983;Barker et al, 1983;Gambôa et al, 1983), as well as the works of Bruhn and Walker (1997), Chang et al (1992), Meisling et al (2001), Viana et al (2003), Fiduk et al (2004) and França et al (2007), were used to identify and date seismicstratigraphic units with submarine slide blocks. Based on the dominant frequency of the interpreted seismic volume (40 Hz), vertical seismic resolution varies between 12 and 19 m in blockladen strata.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data processing included resampling, spherical divergence corrections and zero-phase conversions undertaken prior to stacking, 3D pre-stack time migration using the Stolt algorithm and one-pass 3D migration. Published borehole data from Deep Sea Drilling Program (DSDP) Sites 356 (Kumar et al, 1997) and 515/516 (Barker, 1983;Barker et al, 1983;Gambôa et al, 1983), as well as the works of Bruhn and Walker (1997), Chang et al (1992), Meisling et al (2001), Viana et al (2003), Fiduk et al (2004) and França et al (2007), were used to identify and date seismicstratigraphic units with submarine slide blocks. Based on the dominant frequency of the interpreted seismic volume (40 Hz), vertical seismic resolution varies between 12 and 19 m in blockladen strata.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coherence attributes convert a seismic volume of continuity (normal reflections) into a volume of discontinuity to emphasise faults and stratigraphic limits (Brown, 2004). Block height was measured directly on vertical seismic profiles after converting these for true depths using borehole information in Barker et al (1983) and França et al (2007). Remnant and rafted blocks were interpreted based on the identification of kinematic indicators described in this work.…”
Section: Seismic Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help our analysis, the 3D seismic volume was depth-converted for the Miocene-Holocene interval of interest using an estimated seismic velocity of 1500 m/s for the water column and 1800 m/s for buried strata, based on velocity data at DSDP Site 516 (Barker et al, 1983). The latter p-wave velocities and the dominant frequency of 40 Hz of the seismic volume indicate a vertical resolution of 10 m at the depth of the interpreted MTDs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data is zero-phased migrated with a 12.5 m grid line spacing (inline and crossline). Time-depth conversions were estimated using the seismic velocity profiles measured for Eocene-Oligocene strata at DSDP site 516 (Barker et al, 1983).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%