Proceedings of Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC
DOI: 10.1109/vetec.1996.503405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A second generation 3-D ray-tracing model using rough surface scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a scattering model must be implemented in the simulation. This can be either a stochastic scattering approach or a micro-facet-based scattering model as shown in [20]. By using these field-propagation models in the simulation environment, unprocessed environment sensor data with physical attributes are generated.…”
Section: Classification Of Virtual Sensor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a scattering model must be implemented in the simulation. This can be either a stochastic scattering approach or a micro-facet-based scattering model as shown in [20]. By using these field-propagation models in the simulation environment, unprocessed environment sensor data with physical attributes are generated.…”
Section: Classification Of Virtual Sensor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rough surface can scatter incident sound waves, provided its texture size is comparable to or much larger than the wavelength of the sound. Modelling this reflection can be done using methods such as the Boundary Element Method (BEM) [8] [9], ray tracing [10] [11] [12] or the image-source method [13] [14]. In the case of ray tracing and the image-source method, the reflections are typically assumed to be specular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second solution consists in using an empirical scattering function [13] which gives the scattering field according to the roughness level and the difference in angle between the specular component and the angle to the receiver. The major drawback of this technique comes from its empirical formulation which limits its use to some specific indoor environments and wave propagation conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%