2022
DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2022.2138847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scoping review of the effects of a technology-integrated, inquiry-based approach on primary pupils’ learning in science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous educational research claims about the positive impact of inquiry approaches on students' scientific learning (e.g. Kamarudin et al, 2022;Lin et al, 2021;Murphy et al, 2021). In addition, our study includes the analysis of level explanation of scientific concepts (Hakkarainen, 2003) in the evaluation categories and, therefore, we can also state that students developed socio-scientific reasoning (Romine et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous educational research claims about the positive impact of inquiry approaches on students' scientific learning (e.g. Kamarudin et al, 2022;Lin et al, 2021;Murphy et al, 2021). In addition, our study includes the analysis of level explanation of scientific concepts (Hakkarainen, 2003) in the evaluation categories and, therefore, we can also state that students developed socio-scientific reasoning (Romine et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These three experimental evidences lead us to conclude that the participation in the technological-based learning experience has helped pre-service teachers to develop high-level CK. The digital cognitive maps as an external and metacognitive representation of a co-inquiry challenge-solving promoted learning by building links (Krieglstein et al, 2022;Schneider et al, 2021;Scott et al, 2011), i.e., by learning and assessing the most relevant scientific content related to the "potability of drinking water"; by incorporating these new concepts and defining them in depth; by linking and integrating them by establishing hierarchies and similar sets; by classifying the concepts in large packages of ideas and proceed from the most general to the most concrete and, finally, making the conceptual change that implies recognizing conceptual errors (Kamarudin et al, 2022). Furthermore, pre-service teachers' awareness of typical conceptual errors and general learning difficulties (Derman & Ebenezer, 2020) may help them to anticipate and adjust teaching to their future students, thus promoting PCK development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is fundamental that pupils who are motivated by curiosity acquire and retain information more effectively and take more responsibility for their learning. Students should focus their questions on visual, auditory, or technological learning aids since these enhance their science learning (Kamarudin at al., 2022). The IQFT protocol developed for this study consists of eight main steps, which are listed in Table 3 below.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem-solving category questions involve the implementation methods for solving a problem or issue (Chin & Kayalvizhi, 2002). This category of question differs from the design category in that the design question focuses on technology or product production (Kamarudin et al, 2022). Problem-solving questions encourage students to use their expertise to develop new methods to address challenges.…”
Section: 18mentioning
confidence: 99%