2007
DOI: 10.1512/iumj.2007.56.3113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Schur-Horn theorem in II$_1$ factors

Abstract: Abstract. Given a II 1 factor M and a diffuse abelian von Neumann subalgebra A ⊂ M, we prove a version of the Schur-Horn theorem, namelywhere ≺ denotes spectral majorization, E A the unique trace-preserving conditional expectation onto A, and U M (b) the unitary orbit of b in M. This result is inspired by a recent problem posed by Arveson and Kadison.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5], Arveson and Kadison posed a (strong) version of the Schur-Horn theorem for II 1 factors as a problem and proved related results. As a first step toward settling the Arveson-Kadison problem, the authors have proven in [3] a weaker version, related with the point of view developed in [13]. In this note we obtain a weak contractive version of submajorization within II 1 factors in the spirit of [3] (Theorem 3.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [5], Arveson and Kadison posed a (strong) version of the Schur-Horn theorem for II 1 factors as a problem and proved related results. As a first step toward settling the Arveson-Kadison problem, the authors have proven in [3] a weaker version, related with the point of view developed in [13]. In this note we obtain a weak contractive version of submajorization within II 1 factors in the spirit of [3] (Theorem 3.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Some historical aspects of the theory of majorization are mentioned in [3,5]. The Schur-Horn theorem, coined in the papers [8,15], is probably the most remarkable among the many characterizations known for these notions (see the precise statement of the theorem after Proposition 2.3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [2], the most tractable operators in a type II case are the diagonalizable ones. Applying Lemma 2.1 to a diagonalizable operator, the strong convergence of the "remainders" is obtained by showing that they converge in the trace-norm (Lemma 5.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1] we proved a weaker version of Arveson-Kadison's conjecture, which restricted to the situation in (1) is…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Whether the Schur-Horn theorem extends or not to II 1 factors is unknown at the moment (see [1,3]). In this paper we focus on the CT in II 1 factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%