2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scalable parallel computing SPH framework for predictions of geophysical granular flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the workload, another drawback of MPI is the expensive cost to build a massive multi-processor cluster that is less accessible for ordinary SPH practitioners. Despite this, the superiorities of MPI are evident; the most important one is that MPI can realize large-scale SPH simulations by employing substantial processors up to thousands and even tens of thousands as reported in [264,266,267].…”
Section: Accelerating Sph Simulation With Central Processing Units (Cpus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the workload, another drawback of MPI is the expensive cost to build a massive multi-processor cluster that is less accessible for ordinary SPH practitioners. Despite this, the superiorities of MPI are evident; the most important one is that MPI can realize large-scale SPH simulations by employing substantial processors up to thousands and even tens of thousands as reported in [264,266,267].…”
Section: Accelerating Sph Simulation With Central Processing Units (Cpus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 9. Comparable results of a strong scaling analysis for an SPH implementation are given, e.g., in [45] (r c / x = 2.5) and [69] (r c / x = 2.4), however, in contrast to this example (r c / x = 3.0) with a smaller ratio of the support radius r c and the initial particle spacing x, resulting in a lower influence on the communication overhead, cf. Remark 9.…”
Section: Strong Scaling Analysis Of Parallel Computational Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the second invariants 𝐽 2 for the Drucker-Prager criterion, the deviatoric shear stress rate 𝑠 ̇𝛼𝛽 should be obtained from the rheological model as described in Yang et al (2020) as:…”
Section: Soil Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%