A routing protocol for packet radio networks

Murthy, Shree; Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J.

doi:10.1145/215530.215560

Cited by 149 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The WRP protocol [22] also guarantees loops freedom and it avoids temporary routing loops by using the predecessor information. However, WRP requires each node to maintain four routing tables.…”

Section: Wireless Routing Protocol (Wrp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks

Abolhasan

Wysocki

Dutkiewicz³

2004

Ad Hoc Networks

991

589

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 1990s have seen a rapid growth of research interests in mobile ad hoc networking. The infrastructureless and the dynamic nature of these networks demands new set of networking strategies to be implemented in order to provide efficient end-to-end communication. This, along with the diverse application of these networks in many different scenarios such as battlefield and disaster recovery, have seen MANETs being researched by many different organisations and institutes. MANETs employ the traditional TCP/IP structure to provide end-to-end communication between nodes. However, due to their mobility and the limited resource in wireless networks, each layer in the TCP/IP model require redefinition or modifications to function efficiently in MANETs. One interesting research area in MANET is routing. Routing in the MANETs is a challenging task and has received a tremendous amount of attention from researches. This has led to development of many different routing protocols for MANETs, and each author of each proposed protocol argues that the strategy proposed provides an improvement over a number of different strategies considered in the literature for a given network scenario. Therefore, it is quite difficult to determine which protocols may perform best under a number of different network scenarios, such as increasing node density and traffic. In this paper, we provide an overview of a wide range of routing protocols proposed in the literature. We also provide a performance comparison of all routing protocols and suggest which protocols may perform best in large networks. AbstractThe 1990s have seen a rapid growth of research interests in mobile ad hoc networking. The infrastructureless and the

show abstract

Section: Wireless Routing Protocol (Wrp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks

Abolhasan

Wysocki

Dutkiewicz³

2004

Ad Hoc Networks

991

589

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The update to L 1 (1,1) stops at L 1 (1,1), while the update to L 1 (3,1) continues to be unicast to L 2 (3,3), since a level-1 boundary crossing requires the next hierarchical leader L 2 (3,3) to be updated. Notice that the movement of another node D 2 terminates at L 1 (1,3), since the movement is local to the L 1 hierarchy managed by L 1 (1,3). Note that each step shown in the figure may consist of multiple physical transmissions of the update packet to reach the specified grid.…”

Section: Fig 2 Location Update In Hgridmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to mobility, the network topology varies frequently, and end-to-end sessions are subject to link failures constantly. While many solutions have been proposed for routing in mobile ad hoc networks [1][2][3][4][5][6], few have considered the issue of scalability of such protocols in networks having node membership in the order of thousands, and spread over a large geographic area. A unique characteristic of ad hoc networks is that the limited bandwidth of the wireless channel is shared by signalling traffic as well as data, and the former is given a higher priority than data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance evaluation of a multilevel hierarchical location management protocol for ad hoc networks

Philip¹,

Ghosh²,

Qiao³

2005

Computer Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Therefore, proactive routings are more suitable for small scale MANETs with low node mobility and heavy traffic. DSDV [2], WRP [3], CGSR [4], and OLSR [5] are examples of this type of protocols. Reactive routing protocols, on the other hand, create and maintain routes only to meet current demands.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Cluster Routing: An Efficient Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Niu

Tao

et al. 2006

2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-Routing is one of the fundamental but challenging issues in mobile ad hoc networks. During the past several years, a large number of routing protocols have been proposed, which can basically be categorized into three different groups including proactive/table-driven, reactive/on-demand, and hybrid. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid routing protocol for large scale mobile ad hoc networks, namely HCR (Hybrid Cluster Routing). Here nodes are organized into a hierarchical structure of multi-hop clusters using a stable distributed clustering algorithm. Each cluster is composed of a clusterhead, several gateway nodes, and other ordinary nodes. The clusterhead is responsible for maintaining local membership and global topology information. In HCR, the acquisition of intra-cluster routing information operates in an on-demand fashion and the maintenance of inter-cluster routing information acts in a proactive way. Simulation results show that HCR conduces better scalability, robustness and adaptability to large scale mobile ad hoc networks compared with some well-known routing protocols, e.g. AODV, DSR, and CBRP.

show abstract

A routing protocol for packet radio networks

Cited by 149 publications

References 7 publications

A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks

A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks

Performance evaluation of a multilevel hierarchical location management protocol for ad hoc networks

Hybrid Cluster Routing: An Efficient Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About