2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A route-based visibility analysis for landscape management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent research, Garré et al (2009) calculated three morphological metrics of the visible landscape from random viewpoints using GIS, and compared the results from the on-road viewpoints with those offroad, to investigate the visual access to the landscape offered by roads. Chamberlain & Meitner (2013) analysed route-based visual magnitude of DTM cells for views from a tourist highway, to demonstrate a more advanced GIS application for planning. However, no attempt seems to have been made to predict human-perceived visual impact of road projects in GIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent research, Garré et al (2009) calculated three morphological metrics of the visible landscape from random viewpoints using GIS, and compared the results from the on-road viewpoints with those offroad, to investigate the visual access to the landscape offered by roads. Chamberlain & Meitner (2013) analysed route-based visual magnitude of DTM cells for views from a tourist highway, to demonstrate a more advanced GIS application for planning. However, no attempt seems to have been made to predict human-perceived visual impact of road projects in GIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution of the 120 images over the 100 questionnaires. questionnaire 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual magnitude result is a floating point whose values are from 0 (no visibility) to 1 (complete visibility) and is computed taking into account the fact that the visible area decreases with the square of the distance. Different formulations for the calculation of the visual magnitude can be found on the literature (Grêt-Regamey et al, 2007;Chamberlain & Meitner, 2013). As can be easily understood, in reality visual magnitude assumes very low values, because they have the physical meaning of the amount of area occupied on an observer view.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual magnitude and visual exposure concepts have been widely used in the rural and forest landscape analysis (Kearney et al, 2008;Domingo-Santos et al, 2011;Jakab & Petluš, 2012;Chamberlain & Meitner, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, VM assesses the topographical terrain data from the viewer's perspective by calculating distance, slope and direction of the view and topography (Chamberlain and Meitner 2013). VM is calculated based on a digital elevation model (DEM), so the resolution of the analysis is dependent upon the resolution of the DEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%