2008
DOI: 10.1080/15325000802258380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Method of Tuning the Feedback Gains of a Variable Structure Load Frequency Controller Using Genetic Algorithm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are also analyzed with 0.03 p.u MW load disturbance in area 1 as presented in the previous study . The dynamic responses of frequency and tie‐line power has approximate peak undershoots of −0.071, −0.038, and −0.028 using GA .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results are also analyzed with 0.03 p.u MW load disturbance in area 1 as presented in the previous study . The dynamic responses of frequency and tie‐line power has approximate peak undershoots of −0.071, −0.038, and −0.028 using GA .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Examining the performance parameters from Table and dynamic responses of control inputs and deviations in frequency from Figure to Figure , it is obvious that the DOGSA‐optimized SMC controller stabilizes the system and performs better as compared to GA, PSO, and TLBO‐optimized sliding mode controller . To achieve this, the following are the feedback gains ( ρ ) and switching vector ( S T ) values of SMC optimized by DOGSA in order to study the dynamic response and the chattering phenomenon in the control signal while solving interconnected power system load frequency control problem: ρ=[],0.35410.75em0.08420.75em0.21301em0.69211em0.13340.75em0.53820.75em0.01300.75em0.03840.75em0.00790.03541em0.33331em0.22420.75em0.18720.75em0.03901em0.00091em1.16281em0.05240.75em0.4181, ST=[],0.12em0.32841em0.00960.75em0.84921em0.20551em0.06120.75em0.31090.75em0.00911em0.02270.75em0.44360.09231em0.53900.75em0.01000.75em0.19280.75em0.06111em0.17731em0.79811em0.27060.75em0.7252. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Output feedback sliding mode control optimized with teaching learning‐based optimization implemented for AGC problems . Variable structure controller optimized with genetic algorithm (GA) was employed for AGC problem …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%