A robust forwarding node selection mechanism for efficient communication in urban VANETs

Modeling cooperative behavior for resilience in cyber-physical systems using SDN and NFV

“…We have found a considerable number of contributions addressing incentive models for cooperation among players in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) to study the evolution of players' behavior (selfish vs. cooperative) under different network conditions [31,32], to motivate nodes to act as communication relays [33,34], and to influence nodes to support QoS-based communications [35]. A related survey is available in [36], which discusses several mechanisms to enforce cooperation.…”

Replication-Based Data Dissemination in Connected Internet of Vehicles

“…Fan et al [9] considered vehicles with the same capability while Lin et al [21] studied resource allocation in vehicular cloud computing systems with heterogeneous vehicles and proposed a semi-Markov based architecture to achieve optimal resource allocation. Ghorai et al [22] considered that the obstacles might affect radio propagation and then proposed a forwarding node selection algorithm based on fuzzy logic. Ding et al [23] studied the cooperation in group vehicular interactions and presented a dynamic member public goods game model and a greedy based neighbour selection scheme towards the high density vehicular networks.…”

Reliable broadcast mechanism for emergency message in urban vehicular ad hoc networks

“…In their protocol, adjacent forwarder candidates can forward a packet at the same time. Ghorai and Banerjee [20] proposed a robust forwarding node selection mechanism for efficient communication between vehicles. On that forwarding zone, a robust node is selected using fuzzy logic for efficient data dissemination.…”

“…When the vehicle receives the previous message, if the Waiting Timer is running, the Timer keeps running only when the message is from non-IA and the vehicle at IA has not received implicit ACK from all directions where neighbours exist, otherwise, the vehicle cancels the Timer and discards the duplicate message. Especially, when the vehicle is IPV and receives the [10] 2016 density based highway NDD [11] 2015 distance and message size based highway BDSC [12] 2016 link qualities for single-hop neighbour based highway DDP4V [13] 2018 partition and distance based highway and urban JFRN [14] 2015 fuzzy logic based highway and urban BSM [15] 2015 time and frequency based highway TB [18] 2019 super-node based urban LER-GR [6] 2017 the least error in location based urban VBURL [4] 2018 distance based urban TURBO [16] 2015 one-hop neighbour based urban UMBP [17] 2016 iterative partition, mini-slot, and black-burst based urban CTB [19] 2018 concurrent transmission based urban RFNSM [20] 2018 fuzzy logic based urban message from the intersection, the 'flag' filed of the message in its schedule table change to be zero. If the Rebroadcast Waiting Timer is running, which means the vehicle has forwarded the message and is waiting for implicit ACK, the Timer keeps running only when the vehicle at IA has not received implicit ACK from all directions where neighbours exist, otherwise, the vehicle cancels the Timer and discards the duplicate message.…”