Nanomaterials for Magnetic and Optical Hyperthermia Applications 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-813928-8.00012-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Roadmap to the Standardization of In Vivo Magnetic Hyperthermia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen spherical 11 nm iron oxide MNPs (11.2 ± 0.8 nm, Figure ), as this diameter is within the most commonly studied range for in vivo magnetic hyperthermia experiments . This diameter fulfills the requirements for in vivo experimentation, as it avoids fast renal clearance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen spherical 11 nm iron oxide MNPs (11.2 ± 0.8 nm, Figure ), as this diameter is within the most commonly studied range for in vivo magnetic hyperthermia experiments . This diameter fulfills the requirements for in vivo experimentation, as it avoids fast renal clearance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45] Although magnetic hyperthermia is not yet a routine treatment, clinical trials are ongoing. With the clinical application of magnetic hyperthermia in mind, the following restrictions need to be considered regarding particle design to optimize the heating: [46] (1) focus on biocompatibility [47] and biodegradation: iron oxide nanoparticles are hitherto the only clinically approved heat transducers to be administered to humans. [48] (2) focus on Néel relaxation: iron oxide nanoparticles have to preserve their heating performance when intracellularly immobilized, as in the cellular milieu a physical rotation of nanoparticles, i.e.…”
Section: Designing the Ideal Iron Oxide Nanoparticles For Magnetic Hy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range between these two criteria seems to be currently the most convenient and most used in several in vivo trials [82], at least until new studies about the biological safety of the alternating magnetic field are carried out.…”
Section: Ac-measurements and Slp Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%