2017
DOI: 10.3390/s17020269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Ring Artifact Correction Method: Validation by Micro-CT Imaging with Flat-Panel Detectors and a 2D Photon-Counting Detector

Abstract: Abstract:We introduce an efficient ring artifact correction method for a cone-beam computed tomography (CT). In the first step, we correct the defective pixels whose values are close to zero or saturated in the projection domain. In the second step, we compute the mean value at each detector element along the view angle in the sinogram to obtain the one-dimensional (1D) mean vector, and we then compute the 1D correction vector by taking inverse of the mean vector. We multiply the correction vector with the sin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Important work was done to analyze visible singularities for ROI (or local) tomography (e.g., [12,25,28,46,50]). However, we are not aware of any reference where a microlocal explanation for the ring artifact in ROI CT was provided, although researchers are well aware of the ring itself (e.g., [7,10]). We are also not aware of microlocal analyses of more general imaging setups, such as the nonstandard one presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important work was done to analyze visible singularities for ROI (or local) tomography (e.g., [12,25,28,46,50]). However, we are not aware of any reference where a microlocal explanation for the ring artifact in ROI CT was provided, although researchers are well aware of the ring itself (e.g., [7,10]). We are also not aware of microlocal analyses of more general imaging setups, such as the nonstandard one presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these methods assume the presence of a specific high-frequency component that is directly related to the ring artifacts. Therefore, they aim to filter out the artifacts using low pass filters [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Most of these, however, fail to remove the strong artifacts related to dead detector elements or damaged areas on the scintillator, in which case they create an extra band around the original ring [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing ring artifacts is more feasible in sinogram domain, since the defective pixels always appears as single or multiple stripe artifacts. Various filters, such as center-weighted median filter [12], wavelet-Fourier filter [13] and Gaussian filter [14] have been utilized in removing ring artifacts. Podgorsak et al proposed a median filtering-based method [19] based on the assumption that the values measured by the same defective pixel have same attenuation against the ideal values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%