A revision of the Platyseiinae (Mesostigmata : Aceosejidae) based on material in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History)

Evans, G O; Hyatt, K H

doi:10.5962/bhl.part.26843

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An important publication that was omitted from Halliday (1998) is Heatwole et al (1981) , which recorded 102 species of mites from One Tree Island, on the Great Barrier Reef, on the basis of data from Done (1975). The observation of Cheiroseius cassiteridum ( Evans & Hyatt) (1960) (Ascidae) is the first record of this species for Australia and it was not included in the revision of the Australian Ascidae of Halliday et al (1998) . The record of Genolaspis ( sic , should be Geholaspis ) (Macrochelidae) actually refers to Holostaspella ateucha Halliday (specimen in the South Australian Museum).…”

Section: Checklist Additions and Correctionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Additions and corrections to Mites of Australia: A Checklist and Bibliography

Halliday

2000

Australian Journal of Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Some corrections and additions to the recently published Mites of Australia: A Checklist and Bibliography are briefly summarised. The most important name changes are in the spider mite family Tetranychidae. The species previously identified in Australia as Allonychus braziliensis (McGregor) is shown to be Tetranychus gloveri Banks. Bryobia cristata (Dugès) is a junior synonym of Bryobia graminum (Schrank). Bryobia repensi Manson is a junior synonym of Bryobia vasiljevi Rekk. Oligonychus biharensis (Hirst) has been recorded from Queensland and Oligonychus punicae (Hirst) and Schizotetranychus asparagi (Oudemans) are now believed to occur in Australia on the basis of unconfirmed records.

show abstract

Section: Checklist Additions and Correctionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Additions and corrections to Mites of Australia: A Checklist and Bibliography

Halliday

2000

Australian Journal of Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other members of this genus were found from moss, litter, soil, dung, and on plants (Evans and Hyatt 1960).…”

Section: Cheiroseius Cassiteridum Evans and Hyattmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seasonal variations of mites of the suborder Mesostigmata (Acarina) from south Florida turfgrasses /

Ing¹

1978

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The genus Ochlodes Scudder, 1872, described with Hesperia nemorum Boisduval, 1852 as the type species, belongs to the family Hesperiidae and is distributed in the Oriental, Palearctic, and Nearctic regions. Evans (1949 , 1955 ) recognized 16 species and 23 subspecies within the genus. Chiba and Tsukiyama (1996) revised the genus based on wing pattern, male genitalia, and geographical distribution.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Molecular and morphological evidence reveals hidden new taxa in Ochlodes ochraceus (Bremer, 1861) (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae) from China

Zhu¹,

Hou²,

Chiba³

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two new species of Ochlodes Scudder, 1872, Ochlodes pseudochraceus Zhu, Fan & Wang, sp. nov. and Ochlodes cryptochraceus Zhu, Fan & Chiba, sp. nov., are found in China and described, and Ochlodes rikuchina (Butler, 1878) stat. rev. is restored. A lectotype is designated for Pamphila ochracea Bremer, 1861, and a neotype is designated for Pamphila rikuchina Butler, 1878. Overall, the two new species are similar to Ochlodes ochraceus (Bremer, 1861). They, however, can be distinguished from the latter and other species in the genus: O. pseudochraceus has long radial spots in spaces R3-5, and the lateral process of the phallus gradually widens at the distal half in male genitalia; O. cryptochraceus has the lateral process of the phallus enlarged only at the distal tip. Based on the phylogenetic analyses of the mitochondrial COI gene, members of currently defined O. ochraceus are grouped into four clades. The genetic distances between O. pseudochraceus and O. ochraceus, O. cryptochraceus and O. ochraceus, O. rikuchina and O. ochraceus, and O. pseudochraceus and O. cryptochraceus are 3.2%, 2.1%, 1.9%, and 2.7%, respectively. Based on the molecular and morphological evidence, O. pseudochraceus, O. cryptochraceus, and O. rikuchina are treated to be distinct species. The adult habitus and male and female genitalia of the new species are illustrated as well as those of O. ochraceus and O. rikuchina.

show abstract

A revision of the Platyseiinae (Mesostigmata : Aceosejidae) based on material in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History)

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Additions and corrections to Mites of Australia: A Checklist and Bibliography

Additions and corrections to Mites of Australia: A Checklist and Bibliography

Seasonal variations of mites of the suborder Mesostigmata (Acarina) from south Florida turfgrasses /

Molecular and morphological evidence reveals hidden new taxa in Ochlodes ochraceus (Bremer, 1861) (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae) from China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

A revision of the Platyseiinae (Mesostigmata : Aceosejidae) based on material in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History)

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Additions and corrections to Mites of Australia: A Checklist and Bibliography

Additions and corrections to Mites of Australia: A Checklist and Bibliography

Seasonal variations of mites of the suborder Mesostigmata (Acarina) from south Florida turfgrasses /

﻿Molecular and morphological evidence reveals hidden new taxa in Ochlodes ochraceus (Bremer, 1861) (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae) from China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Molecular and morphological evidence reveals hidden new taxa in Ochlodes ochraceus (Bremer, 1861) (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae) from China