“…When applied based on sufficient geographic and taxonomic sampling, and, ideally (but not strictly necessary; see below), employing phylogenetic inferences using data from independent sources (e.g., DNA sequence data obtained from independently inherited genes), the dmPSC has improved the taxonomic classifications of various groups of mammals, some of which remained problematic for decades. Among studies that exemplify how the dmPSC has helped to advance mammalian systematics, even if some of them used this species concept without explicitly or correctly invoking it, are those on didelphid marsupials (e.g., Díaz-Nieto & Voss, 2016 ; Giarla et al, 2010 ; Gutiérrez et al, 2010 ; Martínez-Lanfranco et al, 2014 ; Pavan et al, 2017 ; Voss et al, 2018 ), rodents (e.g., Hawkins et al, 2016 ; do Prado & Percequillo, 2017 ; Rogers & González, 2010 ; Voss et al, 2013 ), bats (e.g., Baird et al, 2008 ; Molinari et al, 2017 ; Moras et al, 2016 ; Velazco et al, 2010 ), and medium and large mammals (e.g., Bornholdt et al, 2013 ; Gutiérrez et al, 2015 ; Helgen et al, 2009 , 2013 ; Janečka et al, 2008 ; Koepfli et al, 2008 ; Miranda et al, 2017 ; do Nascimento & Feijó, 2017 (and references therein for phylogenetic evidence)). These studies have not only unraveled the true-species nature of previously unrecognized species, but in many cases have shown that taxa considered as valid species for decades are not valid species at all.…”