2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on the mechanical quality of articular cartilage – Implications for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
6
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We defined each sample as "healthy" or "degenerated" depending on their dynamic stiffness. Indeed, it has been shown that in osteoarthritic cartilage dynamic stiffness is 70% lower than in healthy cartilage (Knecht et al, 2006).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined each sample as "healthy" or "degenerated" depending on their dynamic stiffness. Indeed, it has been shown that in osteoarthritic cartilage dynamic stiffness is 70% lower than in healthy cartilage (Knecht et al, 2006).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The right production of ECM in vitro might require to perform culture under dynamic loading conditions. This has been performed by the development of a broad plethora of bioreactors which induce mechanical stimulus in different ways, such as confined or unconfined compression and hydrostatic pressure, among others (Knecht et al, 2006;Schulz and Bader, 2007;Wong M Fau -Carter and Carter, 2003). It was found that cyclic applications of these stimuli generally produce higher differentiation responses due to a cascade of signaling events that has been called mechanotransduction (Chen et al, 2009;De Croos et al, 2006;Huang et al, 2010a;Mahmoudifar and Doran, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore probably a good approach to define a set of measurable endpoint characteristics for osteochondral tissues to evaluate the experimental steps taken, when going from bench to patient. Osteochondral tissues represent certain geometrical and mechanical properties (Knecht, Vanwanseele et al 2006;Gordeladze, Reseland et al 2009), as well as gene expression profiles (Grundberg, Brandstrom et al 2008;Duggal, Fronsdal et al 2009;Granchi, Ochoa et al 2010;Herlofsen, Kuchler et al 2011), which may guide the selection of major combinations of treatments, as envisaged by the permutation process. To shed light on this exercise, some bioinformatics exercises have been conducted, and some selected experiments have been described.…”
Section: Permutation Of Factors Influencing Cell Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the newly formed engineered tissue does not survive unless it develops a vascular network (Matsumoto, Kuroda et al 2008;Grellier, Bordenave et al 2009) furnishing the bone tissue with oxygen, growth factors and nutrients. Chondrocytes in engineered cartilage should be able to produce an extracellular matrix reflecting the composition, water-binding capacity and mechanical characteristics of true 24 hyaline cartilage (Knecht, Vanwanseele et al 2006;Heinegard 2009;Bertrand, Cromme et al 2010;Goldring and Goldring 2010). This type of cartilage exhibits certain features, such as hypoxic conditions and chondrocytes demonstrating gradients of gene transcript levels (cell phenotype plasticity) between the juxta-luminal and bone-lining surfaces of a joint (Grimshaw and Mason 2001;Lu, Subramony et al 2010;Oh, Kim et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%