A review on mobility models in disaster area scenario

Abstract

Disaster struck does not announce itself and people usually caught with the ad hoc situation. Disaster is divided into two types which are natural disasters and man-made disasters. Natural disasters happen because of a natural phenomenon or process such as earthquakes, tsunamis, typhoons and others. Manmade disasters happen as a consequence of technological or human hazards such train accident, traffic collision, aviation incident (plane crash), structural collapse and others. Such disaster struck events may cause fixed network infrastructure to be partially or fully-destroyed. *Author for correspondenceThe deployment of the fixed network infrastructure will be almost impossible to be re-established and recovered within a short time, especially in remote area where one had never existed.During the disaster struck, two entities would be existed which are victims and rescue teams like firefighters, police, volunteers and medical teams. The communication network is vital, especially after the disaster struck as the rescue teams need to coordinate the Search and Rescue (SAR) operations and mission critical. The real-life situation can remain unknown to the rescue teams involved in the SAR operations or it can be totally different from what it was before the disaster due to the damages. Subsequently, the exchange of data on the latest condition at the disaster area plays a big part and is crucial to save lives and

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

“…Alternatively, [27] surveyed different multihop ad-hoc network paradigms, including mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs), vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), and DTNs, and discussed their importance in the context of disaster response. Reviews on routing and rescue entities' mobility models for MANETs in disaster-struck areas can be found in [28] and [29], respectively. Authors in [30] studied disaster recovery solutions from the perspective of users and network solutions such as device-to-device (D2D) and dynamic wireless networks (DWNs), respectively.…”

“…Indoor and outdoor non-image-based people counting technologies [18] LMR, LTE [25] Routing, MANETs [28] 2020 Autonomous decision-making systems, NFV, SDNs [26] UAV-assisted VANETs, routing protocols [36] 2021 Wireless technologies for resilient networks [33] Mobility models, MANETs [29] Fog computing, disaster evacuation [17] UAV path planning, network security [21] IoT-enabled flood SAR systems [34] Data-plane recovery mechanisms for packet-switched networks [35] 2022…”

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

“…Alternatively, [24] surveyed different multihop ad-hoc network paradigms, including mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs), vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), and DTNs, and discussed their importance in the context of disaster response. A review on rescue entities' mobility models for MANETs in disaster-struck areas can be found in [25]. Authors in [26] studied disaster recovery solutions from the perspective of users and network solutions such as device-to-device (D2D) and dynamic wireless networks (DWNs), respectively.…”

“…Wireless technologies for resilient networks [29] Mobility models, MANETs [25] Fog computing, disaster evacuation [16] UAV path planning, network security [19] IoT-enabled flood SAR systems [30] Data-plane recovery mechanisms for packet-switched networks [31] 2022 Paradigms, physical and networking layers, challenges This paper…”

MANET performance evaluation for DSDV, DSR and ZRP

“…Because of its selfconfiguring, self-repairing, self-functioning, and selfrecovery network, MANET is simple to maintain [4,5]. Since MANET is a decentralized, infrastructureless network, users can configure dynamically wireless connections without an established infrastructure network [6,7]. Military operations like tactical networks and complex defence research were where MANET was first use in the context of application.…”