2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3298651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on Microalgae Application in Bioenergy Generation & Integrated Wastewater Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soils analyzed were classified relative to the pH indicator as slightly alkaline (CRC), moderately alkaline (CTJ < CTH < AGQ), and strongly alkaline (CYI < JRM), possibly due to irrigation practices with well water and the various fertilization regimes used, which are characteristic of the region [60,61] ( Table 1). For the EC indicator, soils were classified as non-saline, when the effect on soil structure due to salt concentration could be considered as negligible [15,31].…”
Section: Physicochemical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soils analyzed were classified relative to the pH indicator as slightly alkaline (CRC), moderately alkaline (CTJ < CTH < AGQ), and strongly alkaline (CYI < JRM), possibly due to irrigation practices with well water and the various fertilization regimes used, which are characteristic of the region [60,61] ( Table 1). For the EC indicator, soils were classified as non-saline, when the effect on soil structure due to salt concentration could be considered as negligible [15,31].…”
Section: Physicochemical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EC indicator showed that high levels of salts were not detected in the solution of the evaluated soils. This could be due to the use of irrigation water with low salt concentrations, in contrast to the use of well water-characteristic of the region-that usually has a high concentrations of salts and thus leads to the accumulation of salts on the soil surface [43]. Similarly, the WHC indicator did not show significant differences between the analysed soils; where they were classified as low capacity (Ac2 < Ir3 < Ir2 < Ir4 < Ir1 < Ac1 < Ac1 < Sa1 < Sa2) or moderate capacity (Sa6 < Ac3).…”
Section: Physicochemical and Biological Characterisation Of Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil presented a slightly alkaline pH, possibly due to the irrigation practices that are characteristic of the region (Fatima et al 2018), where well water with a high content of salts is used, which can affect the growth and yield of crops, the availability of nutrients and the OM content (Leogrande and Vitti 2019). The EC indicator was found within the range considered as non-saline, implying an insignificant effect on the structure and texture of the soil; however, its effect on OM mineralization and enzymatic and microbial activity should not be underestimated (Singh 2016).…”
Section: Soil and Biosolid Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%