2012
DOI: 10.1002/er.1955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on electromechanical equipment applicable to small hydropower plants

Abstract: SUMMARY Small hydropower (SHP) projects are considered by the developers as these provide renewable source of energy and are environment friendly. The basic cost components of SHP scheme are broadly classified as civil works and electromechanical equipment. The most important components under the electromechanical equipment are turbine and generator. In the present paper, an attempt has been made to review the different types of technological models and transfer function developed to evaluate the performance o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the general consensus of the classification of the installed power of the hydropower plants was almost achieved according to the name/title of the installed power of the plants as large, medium, small, mini, micro and pico -159-Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management -http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1142 hydropower plants. Some academics worked on the classification of hydropower plants by the installed power or capacity (P) (see Anderson, Doig, Khennas & Rees, 1999;Castaldi, Chastain, Windram & Ziatyk, 2003;Mishra, Singal & Khatod, 2012;Paish, 2002;Voros, Kiranoudis & Maroulis, 1999). The simple clustering algorithm in this model was built up according to the Algorithm 1 on Figure 1 (0 to 1, 1 to 10, 10 to 100, and 100 to 1.000 in MW).…”
Section: Model Development Execution and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the general consensus of the classification of the installed power of the hydropower plants was almost achieved according to the name/title of the installed power of the plants as large, medium, small, mini, micro and pico -159-Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management -http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1142 hydropower plants. Some academics worked on the classification of hydropower plants by the installed power or capacity (P) (see Anderson, Doig, Khennas & Rees, 1999;Castaldi, Chastain, Windram & Ziatyk, 2003;Mishra, Singal & Khatod, 2012;Paish, 2002;Voros, Kiranoudis & Maroulis, 1999). The simple clustering algorithm in this model was built up according to the Algorithm 1 on Figure 1 (0 to 1, 1 to 10, 10 to 100, and 100 to 1.000 in MW).…”
Section: Model Development Execution and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low sensitivity to the short circuits is conditioned by the deexcitation of the induction generator at a short circuit. The high degree of protection is easily ensured due to the simplicity of the structure (Ramos et al, 2000;Vol'dek, 1978;Pyrhonen et al, 2008;Mishra et al, 2012;Tes, 2017b). The disadvantage of an induction generator is the consumption of reactive power consumed from the network when the generator operates paralelly with the network.…”
Section: Induction Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydropower plants often get lots benefit from air admission or air injection [30][31][32], because which smoothes out the annoying high-frequency components of noise and vibration. In addition, aeration sometimes removes flow instability by manipulating the hydraulic transmission behavior -in particular lowering the draft tube natural frequency [33].…”
Section: Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%