2016
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2016.1189556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods

Abstract: With the ubiquity of advanced web technologies and location-sensing hand held devices, citizens regardless of their knowledge or expertise, are able to produce spatial information. The phenomena is known as Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI). During the last decade VGI has been used as a data source supporting a wide range of services such as environmental monitoring, events reporting, human movement analysis, disaster management etc. However, these volunteer contributed data also come with varying quali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
315
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
315
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods have then been proposed to assess VGI quality; a review can be found in [4][5][6], among others. The quality assessment of VGI POIs is essential as many applications are based on such data, and can be affected by low-quality POIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have then been proposed to assess VGI quality; a review can be found in [4][5][6], among others. The quality assessment of VGI POIs is essential as many applications are based on such data, and can be affected by low-quality POIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, very few studies have reported on the fitness-of-use of the dataset in developing countries [56,[90][91][92][93] using established quality indicators. The established methods are unsuitable to assess OSM data quality in the case of the non-availability of authoritative data [14]. Hence, assessment through intrinsic quality indicators would certainly encourage researchers to have a deeper understanding of datasets.…”
Section: Semantic Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), completeness, thematic similarity, and logical consistency of VGI with authoritative data from NMAs and CSC [5,[17][18][19][20]. For a complete review of data quality assessment methods, see [21]. However, there has been little work documented in the literature in how VGI is actually collected "in the field".…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many differences in how NMAs and CSC collect, analyse, manage and distribute geographic information to that of VGI projects. NMAs and CSC use robust and standardised protocols considered as "terrain nominal" (i.e., an abstract concept defined by a cartographic representation perfectly compliant with data specification) [21], which govern and guide their collection of geographic data. Whilst VGI projects often provide guidelines to their contributors on how to collect and survey geographic data, these guidelines are often flexible and can lack professional geographical survey rigour.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%