2019
DOI: 10.3390/atmos10040168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Representation of Aerosol Mixing State in Atmospheric Models

Abstract: Aerosol mixing state significantly affects concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), wet removal rates, thermodynamic properties, heterogeneous chemistry, and aerosol optical properties, with implications for human health and climate. Over the last two decades, significant research effort has gone into finding computationally-efficient methods for representing the most important aspects of aerosol mixing state in air pollution, weather prediction, and climate models. In this review, we summarize the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
(493 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BC is emitted in hydrophobic and hydrophilic forms (80% and 20%, respectively) with a fixed aging timescale of 1.6 days (Cooke & Wilson, 1996). The two forms are considered to be mixed externally with respect to each other, but BC in hydrophilic form is internally mixed, which can activate cloud droplets (Emmons et al, 2010; Sadiq et al, 2015; Stevens & Dastoor, 2019). The dynamic parameterization scheme adopted is the finite volume dynamical core, with emphasis on the conservation, accuracy, and efficiency of the tracer transport process (Rasch et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BC is emitted in hydrophobic and hydrophilic forms (80% and 20%, respectively) with a fixed aging timescale of 1.6 days (Cooke & Wilson, 1996). The two forms are considered to be mixed externally with respect to each other, but BC in hydrophilic form is internally mixed, which can activate cloud droplets (Emmons et al, 2010; Sadiq et al, 2015; Stevens & Dastoor, 2019). The dynamic parameterization scheme adopted is the finite volume dynamical core, with emphasis on the conservation, accuracy, and efficiency of the tracer transport process (Rasch et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the first three hours, which is the approximate cooking duration in our sampled households, tracheobronchial and alveolar depositions differed by no more than 1.1% and 0.28%, respectively. Taking into account hygroscopic growth but assuming an average mixing state on the other hand, underestimates deposition in the alveoli by up to 5% for aged soot and 20% for fresh soot 54 . These results suggest that neglecting PM hygroscopicity has a relatively small effect on regional deposition, but further work would be needed to determine its impact at a more granular level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Results confirm that CCN activation analysis methods used here and in ambient data sets are robust and may be used to infer the mixing state of complex aerosol compositions of unknown origin. the mixing state and the chemical composition can greatly improve CCN predictions and has been the focus of several studies (e.g., but not limited to Bilde and Svenningsson, 2004;Abbatt et al, 2005;Henning et al, 2005;Svenningsson et al, 2006;King et al, 2007;Cubison et al, 2008;Kuwata and Kondo, 2008;Zaveri et al, 2010;Su et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010;Spracklen et al, 2011;Ervens et al, 2010;Asa-Awuku et al, 2011;Lance et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2013;Jurányi et al, 2013;Paramonov et al, 2013;Padró et al, 2012;Moore et al, 2012;Meng et al, 2014;Bhattu and Tripathi, 2015;Almeida et al, 2014;Schill et al, 2015;Crosbie et al, 2015;Che et al, 2016;Ching et al, 2016;Mallet et al, 2017;Sánchez Gácita et al, 2017;Cai et al, 2018;Schmale et al, 2018;Mahish et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Stevens and Dastoor, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ambient measurements indicate complex aerosol populations consisting of both external and internal mixtures (e.g., but not limited to Ervens et al, 2007;Lance et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2012;Padró et al, 2012). By accounting for the mixing states and extent of mixing in field data sets, CCN concentration predictions can be greatly improved (e.g but not limited to Padró et al, 2012;Wex et al, 2010;Su et al, 2010;Kuwata and Kondo, 2008). However, dynamic changes in particle mixing states have not been reproduced in the laboratory and subsequent treatment of CCN measurement and analysis has not been readily studied in depth under controlled laboratory conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation