2011
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2011.601599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the Ninth International Conference of the Academy of Human Resource Development (Asia Chapter) in Shanghai, China: workplace learning and sustainable development for individual, organization and society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this body of work in HRD-related literature listed in Table 1, Swanson (2008) described the relationship of a principal and agent to help initiate the groundwork for research by HRD professionals of agency behavior and nonagency behaviors. Following were proposals for using the utility of agency theory to explain training and development outcomes (Azevedo & Akdere, 2008, 2010, 2011; Li & Huang, 2011). The empirical studies conducted and published within the HRD-related literature identified in this review described the limitations of their studies to application to the case and sample studied due to the sample size or specificity of the participants and respondents (Alammar & Pauleen, 2015; Blakeley & Higgs, 2014; Glick, 2011; Liu, Valenti, & Chen, 2016; O’Reilly, Doerr, Caldwell, & Chatman, 2014; Petrescu & Simmons, 2008; Rusaw & Rusaw, 2008; Singh, 2003).…”
Section: Agency Theory In Hrd-related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this body of work in HRD-related literature listed in Table 1, Swanson (2008) described the relationship of a principal and agent to help initiate the groundwork for research by HRD professionals of agency behavior and nonagency behaviors. Following were proposals for using the utility of agency theory to explain training and development outcomes (Azevedo & Akdere, 2008, 2010, 2011; Li & Huang, 2011). The empirical studies conducted and published within the HRD-related literature identified in this review described the limitations of their studies to application to the case and sample studied due to the sample size or specificity of the participants and respondents (Alammar & Pauleen, 2015; Blakeley & Higgs, 2014; Glick, 2011; Liu, Valenti, & Chen, 2016; O’Reilly, Doerr, Caldwell, & Chatman, 2014; Petrescu & Simmons, 2008; Rusaw & Rusaw, 2008; Singh, 2003).…”
Section: Agency Theory In Hrd-related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%