2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-020-02878-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the nature, role and control of lithobionts on stone cultural heritage: weighing-up and managing biodeterioration and bioprotection

Abstract: SEFL also thanks prof. Rosanna Piervittori, dr. Enrica Matteucci (Università di Torino), dr. Ada Roccardi (Istituto Superiore per la Conservazione e il Restauro, Roma), and all the colleagues of the Working Group for Cultural Heritage of the Italian Lichen Society for many stimulating discussions on lichens and other lithobionts in the last two decades.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
(135 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution to soil formation may be facilitated by the nitrogen fixation of lichens with a cyanobacterial symbiont [29][30][31]. As a contrast, the lichen weathering of historic monuments has been viewed as a disbenefit, although some dispute exists as to whether lichen colonisation is offset by thermal insulation and impermeability, thus providing protection of stone [97].…”
Section: Supporting: Biogeochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution to soil formation may be facilitated by the nitrogen fixation of lichens with a cyanobacterial symbiont [29][30][31]. As a contrast, the lichen weathering of historic monuments has been viewed as a disbenefit, although some dispute exists as to whether lichen colonisation is offset by thermal insulation and impermeability, thus providing protection of stone [97].…”
Section: Supporting: Biogeochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been few studies on the colonization of the newly produced material by environmental microorganisms, although a recent article reviews the methodologies employed to assess the durability of cultural heritage stone surfaces in response to microbial colonization [92]. Recolonization after the use of non-biological consolidants on marble, sandstone and plaster in the archeological site of Fiesole, Italy, was shown to depend mainly on the bioreceptivity of the substrate and the climatic conditions [93].…”
Section: Biodeterioration Testing and Colonization Of Biocalcitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such bioprotection would have the additional advantage of being more compatible with the preservation of heritage surfaces in comparison to traditional protective coatings. More and more studies in recent conservation literature have investigated the role of biofilms on heritage surfaces, taking into account both biodeterioration and bioprotection processes [ 118 , 119 ]. Thus, in the near future, it will be vital to have techniques and protocols to clearly understand when we are dealing with biodeterioration, a mere aesthetic alteration, or bioprotection.…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%