A Review of the Mechanisms of Faecal Coliform Removal from Algal and Duckweed Waste Stabilization Pond Systems

Abstract

The use of eco-technologies for wastewater treatment such as algal and duckweed-based pond systems is becoming popular in developing countries owing to its affordability and efficiency of pathogen removal in warm climates. The pathogen removal mechanisms of these treatment systems however is still not clearly understood and existing knowledge is also scattered in journals and books of different disciplines. The purpose of this paper is to provide a concise review of knowledge acquired in recent times on faecal coliform removal mechanisms in algal and duckweed ponds in a comparative way while identifying knowledge gaps that still exist. This review pays particular attention to little known removal mechanisms such as the role of algal biomass, attachment and sedimentation of faecal coliforms and the role of predation by macroinvertebrates and protozoans. Recent experiments showed that algal ponds, in comparison with duckweed ponds, are more efficient in faecal coliform removal due to the high pH and oxygenation that occur in the former and the rate of inactivation of faecal coliforms increases with increased algal biomass till a certain optimum concentration after which it decreases. This optimal algal concentration for maximum destruction of faecal coliforms can be affected by the quality and strength of the wastewater. Algae also appeared to have a destructive effect on faecal coliforms even in darkness, a phenomenon that may be the effect of toxic substances from the algae. Results also show that the role of invertebrates, particularly macroinvertebrates may be more important in duckweed pond systems. Removal of faecal coliforms through attachment and sedimentation in both duckweed and algal ponds appear to be dependent largely on concentrations of faecal coliforms present and to some extent on suspended plant and particulate matter concentrations. Wide variations in removal efficiencies were however observed. We conclude that the wide variations in removal efficiencies can be addressed by standardizing operating conditions of treatment systems. Further work is necessary to identify the substances produced by algae which appeared to be toxic to faecal coliforms as well as establishing the relative importance of predation by protozoans and macro-invertebrates in the removal of faecal coliforms.

On the hydrodynamics and treatment efficiency of waste stabilisation ponds: From a literature review to a strategic evaluation framework

“…In addition, several review articles about aspects of pond design principles based on pathogen inactivation models (Ho et al, 2017), and die-off mechanisms of bacterial indicators (Ansa et al, 2015;Bolton et al, 2010;Verbyla and Mihelcic, 2015) suggested that an update on the efficiency of WSP treatment from the hydrodynamic perspective was needed. It is the primary aim of this present review to update, refine and extend Sah et al…”

Phytoremediation Using Aquatic Plants

“…Similarly, a review comparing Lemna sp. treatment ponds against unplanted treatment ponds showed that the latter had greater removal rates of E.colifacilitated by the greater exposure of the water to UV light and the subsequent photodegradation and microbial die-off (Ansa et al, 2015). However, Decamp & Warren (2000)have…”

“…The variability of the results obtained between planted and unplanted experiments suggests that for each treatment system different mechanisms of microbial pollutant removal become dominant. Within unplanted facultative systems or lagoons it is likely that oxygenation and phytodegradation from UV light are the dominant methods of removal (Ansa et al, 2015).…”

Performance of inclined plates settler integrated with constructed wetland for high turbidity water treatment

“…The removal of FC in the IPS is thought to have been mainly aided by sedimentation processes of the attached bacteria on solid particles supported by the entrapment by the biofilm developed on the surface of the inclined plates. While in the CW, the major process is through filtration by the gravels and plant roots, as well as other processes such as natural die-off and predation by larger organisms (Ansa et al 2015;Garcia et al 2010;Mtavangu et al 2017;Wu et al 2016).…”