2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2012.00008.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the lichen family Parmeliaceae – history, phylogeny and current taxonomy

Abstract: The largest family of lichen‐forming fungi, the Parmeliaceae, is reviewed. It includes 79 genera in current use and ca 2726 species, a large majority of which belong to one of five main clades: the parmelioid, cetrarioid, usneoid, alectorioid and hypogymnioid. However, 21 genera are positioned outside these clades, and four genera in current use still lack DNA‐ data. The family has been shown to be monophyletic and the generic classification is relatively well‐settled compared with other lecanoralean families.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(287 reference statements)
2
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus one prerequisite for identifying such a character is elucidating the phylogenetic relationships of the group of interest (Ridley 1983;Pagel and Harvey 1988). Recently, a number of phylogenetic studies enhanced our knowledge of evolution and phylogenetic relationships within Parmeliaceae (Crespo et al 2010(Crespo et al , 2011Thell et al 2012). All genera currently accepted in Parmeliaceae in a wide sense (including the sometimes recognized Anziaceae, Alectoriaceae, Hypogymniaceae and Usneaceae) form a well-supported monophyletic group in all major published analyses (Persoh and Rambold 2002;Crespo et al 2007Arup et al 2007).…”
Section: Parmelia Sulcata and Flavoparmelia Caperatamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus one prerequisite for identifying such a character is elucidating the phylogenetic relationships of the group of interest (Ridley 1983;Pagel and Harvey 1988). Recently, a number of phylogenetic studies enhanced our knowledge of evolution and phylogenetic relationships within Parmeliaceae (Crespo et al 2010(Crespo et al , 2011Thell et al 2012). All genera currently accepted in Parmeliaceae in a wide sense (including the sometimes recognized Anziaceae, Alectoriaceae, Hypogymniaceae and Usneaceae) form a well-supported monophyletic group in all major published analyses (Persoh and Rambold 2002;Crespo et al 2007Arup et al 2007).…”
Section: Parmelia Sulcata and Flavoparmelia Caperatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parmeliaceae is the largest family of lichen-forming fungi, consisting of over 2700 species (Thell et al 2012). The family includes well-known foliose and fruticose lichens, such as beard-lichens (Usnea) and species that are frequently used in monitoring of air pollution, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to note that the taxonomic affinity of M. disjuncta is uncertain and requires further studies (e.g. [2,38] DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTERS. Thallus foliose, forming rosettes or irregular, weakly appressed to the substrate.…”
Section: Xanthoparmelia Deliseimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hale, comprising ca. 800 species of worldwide distribution belongs to the largest family of lichenized fungi -Parmeliaceae [1,2]. The distinguishing features of the genus are: hyphal cell walls' polysaccharides with Xanthoparmelia-type lichenan [3][4][5], small ascospores with an arachiform vacuolar body [6], lack of pseudocyphellae, presence of a pored epicortex, eperforate apothecia, the presence of bifusiform conidia and usually simple rhizines [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generic circumscription in Parmeliaceae and in lichen forming fungi in general are continually being revised as a consequence of new understandings and advent of new technologies-from light microscopes to DNA sequences, and through extrolites and molecular phylogenetic analyses (reviewed in Lumbsch 1998;Nimis 1998;Grube & Winka 2002;Lumbsch 2007;Printzen 2010;Crespo et al 2011;Thell et al 2012;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%