1979
DOI: 10.2307/3494083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Biology of the Fall Armyworm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
525
1
41

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 690 publications
(580 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
525
1
41
Order By: Relevance
“…Egg masses oviposited on the screen of the cages during the evaluation period were also found but not counted. This behavior had previously been reported by Luginbill (1928) and later by Sparks (1979), who noted that large populations of S. frugiperda can lay their eggs in non-host plants and objects. This non-specific oviposition behavior of S. frugiperda had also been reported by Rojas et al (2003), who found several moths laying their eggs on striated surfaces, indicating that short distances (a physical factor) have greater influence than plant volatiles on oviposition location choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Egg masses oviposited on the screen of the cages during the evaluation period were also found but not counted. This behavior had previously been reported by Luginbill (1928) and later by Sparks (1979), who noted that large populations of S. frugiperda can lay their eggs in non-host plants and objects. This non-specific oviposition behavior of S. frugiperda had also been reported by Rojas et al (2003), who found several moths laying their eggs on striated surfaces, indicating that short distances (a physical factor) have greater influence than plant volatiles on oviposition location choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Grasses, and more specifically maize, certainly offer S. frugiperda larvae better shelter than soybean or cotton. As larvae hatch from the eggs they find shelter on maize whorl, a site that makes it more difficult for predation and chemical control to succeed (Sparks, 1979;Prowell et al, 2004). Despite all these possible different explanations, it seems that none of them alone can explain S. frugiperda intake regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) is a polyphagous noctuid that feeds on over 60 species of plants and is a periodic, but serious, pest of maize, rice, sorghum, turf grasses, cotton, and peanuts (Luginbill, 1928;Sparks, 1979). Larvae often disperse from the original host plant, in part because of frequent and negative effects of overcrowding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larvae often disperse from the original host plant, in part because of frequent and negative effects of overcrowding. Females lay up to 200 eggs in an egg mass on a single host, often exceeding the resources available to offspring (Sparks, 1979;Pitre et al, 1983;Chapman et al, 1999b). Individuals that remain on the original host plant face competition for resources and the threat of cannibalism from conspecifics (Chapman et al, 1999b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dependence on plant-provided signals could facilitate plant specialization in both species. The two parasitoids are generalists and can potentially attack a broad range of noctuid Lepidoptera (Lingren et al 1970;Cave 1995), but with the massive cultivation of cereals throughout Mexico, they can be expected to most frequently parasitize the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), which is a major subtropical pest of maize and sorghum (Kranz et al 1977;Sparks 1979;Knipling 1980;Pashley 1986). Spodoptera frugiperda has a broad potential host range of more than 60 plant species, mainly grasses (Luginbill 1928).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%