2018
DOI: 10.1214/17-sts629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Self-Exciting Spatio-Temporal Point Processes and Their Applications

Abstract: Self-exciting spatio-temporal point process models predict the rate of events as a function of space, time, and the previous history of events. These models naturally capture triggering and clustering behavior, and have been widely used in fields where spatio-temporal clustering of events is observed, such as earthquake modeling, infectious disease, and crime. In the past several decades, advances have been made in estimation, inference, simulation, and diagnostic tools for self-exciting point process models. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(104 reference statements)
2
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A temporal point process (TPP) is a stochastic process composed of a time series of events that occur in continuous time [16]. The temporal point process is widely used for modeling the sequence data with time information, such as health-care analysis, earthquakes and aftershocks modeling and social network analysis [9], [17], [18]. The traditional methods of temporal point processes usually make parametric assumptions about how the observed events are generated, e.g., by Poisson processes or self-exciting point processes.…”
Section: B Temporal Point Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A temporal point process (TPP) is a stochastic process composed of a time series of events that occur in continuous time [16]. The temporal point process is widely used for modeling the sequence data with time information, such as health-care analysis, earthquakes and aftershocks modeling and social network analysis [9], [17], [18]. The traditional methods of temporal point processes usually make parametric assumptions about how the observed events are generated, e.g., by Poisson processes or self-exciting point processes.…”
Section: B Temporal Point Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, the marked temporal point process (MTPP) is a general mathematical framework to model the event time and type information of a sequence. It has been widely used for predicting the earthquakes and aftershocks [9]. The traditional MTPP models make assumptions about how the events occur, which may be violated in reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations from self-exciting point process models have proved useful both for examining inference and for the simulation studies that are discussed in Sections 2 and 4. Various simulation algorithms for self-exciting point processes have been discussed by Reinhart (2018), section 3.3. We chose to use an algorithm that was introduced by Zhuang et al (2004) for earthquake aftershock sequence models, which is fast and efficient for our model structure.…”
Section: Simulation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adapted the expectation-maximization procedure to fit our extended model. The expectation-maximization procedure for self-exciting processes was first described by Veen and Schoenberg (2008) and follows the general procedure that was described by Reinhart (2018), section 3.1. A latent variable u i is introduced for each event i, indicating whether the event came from the background process (u i = 0) or was triggered by a previous event j (u i = j).…”
Section: Parameter Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, once an event occurs in the process, no matter whether it is a background event or an event excited by others, it excites a process of its own direct offspring according to some probability rules. Many powerful tools have been developed for the Hawkes process, such as stochastic declustering, stochastic reconstruction, the expectation-maximization algorithm, first-and higher order residuals, and Bayesian analysis, as well as the theories that are associated with the asymptotic properties (see the review by Reinhart (2018)) The most common tools to predict crimes include 'hotspotting' (e.g. Bowers et al (2004), Ratcliffe (2004) and Levine (2017)), 'near repeats' (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%